Literature DB >> 19250348

Why are there so few working-class applicants to medical schools? Learning from the success stories.

Jonathan Mathers1, Jayne Parry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Students from lower socio-economic circumstances remain under-represented in UK medical schools despite recent shifts in other demographic variables and specific policy emphasis on widening participation (WP). This study aimed to further understanding of the reasons for this.
METHODS: Volunteer participants at three English medical schools took part in narrative-style, in-depth interviews examining their pathways into medicine and the relationships between these pathways and participants' socio-cultural, educational and family backgrounds. This analysis uses findings from interviews with 12 mature students from working-class backgrounds. It employs theoretical work from the wider field of education sociology that has investigated the relationship between higher education decision making and class.
RESULTS: This study demonstrates how 'normal working-class biographies', constructed by the majority of students targeted by WP activity, result from the influences of socio-cultural context, as well as familial and institutional habitus. The resultant influence on habitus as identity and, in particular, the disjuncture between working-class perceptions of medicine and individual identities are key to understanding the reasons behind the low number of working-class applicants to medical school.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that aim to increase participation rates in medicine must address this disjuncture. This might be achieved by re-orienting working-class identities and perceptions of medicine as a profession. However, it should be acknowledged that 'identity conflict' is related to the elite image that medicine maintains within contemporary society and, as such, efforts to re-orient individual working-class identities may have only a limited impact on overall participation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250348     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03274.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  18 in total

1.  Successfully widening access to medicine. Part 2: Curriculum design and student progression.

Authors:  Sally Curtis; Carolyn Blundell; Christine Platz; Linda Turner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Which disadvantaged students study medicine? Analysis of an English outreach scheme.

Authors:  Carolyn Murray; Anna Mountford-Zimdars; Karen Mattick
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Widening access to UK medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: modelling the impact of the UKCAT in the 2009 cohort.

Authors:  Paul A Tiffin; Jonathan S Dowell; John C McLachlan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-17

4.  Widening access to medical education for under-represented socioeconomic groups: population based cross sectional analysis of UK data, 2002-6.

Authors:  Jonathan Mathers; Alice Sitch; Jennifer L Marsh; Jayne Parry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-22

5.  Role of students' context in predicting academic performance at a medical school: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tamara Thiele; Daniel Pope; A Singleton; D Stanistreet
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Risk factors associated with academic difficulty in an Australian regionally located medical school.

Authors:  Bunmi S Malau-Aduli; Teresa O'Connor; Robin A Ray; Yolanda van der Kruk; Michelle Bellingan; Peta-Ann Teague
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Widening interest, widening participation: factors influencing school students' aspirations to study medicine.

Authors:  Alexander J Martin; Benjamin J Beska; Greta Wood; Nicola Wyatt; Anthony Codd; Gillian Vance; Bryan Burford
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Private schooling and admission to medicine: a case study using matched samples and causal mediation analysis.

Authors:  Muir Houston; Michael Osborne; Russell Rimmer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Lessons learned from 15 years of non-grades-based selection for medical school.

Authors:  Karen M Stegers-Jager
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Transitional journeys into, and through medical education for First-in-Family (FiF) students: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Andrew Mark Bassett; Caragh Brosnan; Erica Southgate; Heidi Lempp
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.