Literature DB >> 19250155

Patients' priorities for ambulatory hospital care centres. A survey and discrete choice experiment among elderly and chronically ill patients of a Dutch hospital.

Akke Albada1, Mattanja Triemstra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study established patients' preferences regarding the facilities in an adjacent centre for ambulatory hospital care. It also identified determinants of patients' choice to visit this centre instead of the regional hospital.
METHODS: A questionnaire survey among 1477 elderly and chronically ill people (response 72%) assessed patients' expectations regarding (a) quality of hospital care, (b) facilities in centres for ambulatory hospital care, and (c) future use of these centres. Additionally, 75 patients participated in discrete choice experiments about their decision to visit a centre for ambulatory hospital care or the regional hospital.
RESULTS: Respondents prioritized facilities for examination and medical consultations in the ambulatory care centres. Half of the respondents also valued paramedic care, information desks and pharmacies as centre facilities. Most patients living near a future centre for ambulatory care would rather visit this centre than the regional hospital. However, they favoured seeing their familiar physician, short waiting lists and appointments scheduled consecutively on 1 day. If these aspects were not guaranteed at the adjacent centres, more patients chose to visit the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients value most facilities, they set clear priorities. Furthermore, this study showed three important conditions in the decision to visit an ambulatory care centre; (1) the possibility to see their familiar physician, (2) to have consecutive appointments, and (3) a short waiting list. These three factors were more important to patients than proximity. Thus, when choosing between a hospital and an adjacent centre for ambulatory care, quality aspects matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250155      PMCID: PMC5060473          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00533.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  22 in total

1.  Developing an assessment tool for evaluating community involvement.

Authors:  Jane South; Pat Fairfax; Eleanor Green
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Public dialogue on healthcare prioritisation.

Authors:  Per Rosén
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  The introduction of integrated out-of-hours arrangements in England: a discrete choice experiment of public preferences for alternative models of care.

Authors:  Karen Gerard; Val Lattimer; Heidi Surridge; Steve George; Joanne Turnbull; Abigail Burgess; Judith Lathlean; Helen Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-28

5.  Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi; Mark Wardman; Jeremy Toner; Mandy Ryan; Sara Duffett
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?

Authors:  Paul A Nutting; Meredith A Goodwin; Susan A Flocke; Stephen J Zyzanski; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 7.  Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care.

Authors:  John W Saultz
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  User involvement in clinical governance.

Authors:  Susan Pickard; Martin Marshall; Anne Rogers; Rod Sheaff; Bonnie Sibbald; Stephen Campbell; Shirley Halliwell; Martin Roland
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?

Authors:  David Reeleder; Douglas K Martin; Christian Keresztes; Peter A Singer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gibson; Douglas K Martin; Peter A Singer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Do patients choose community health services (CHS) for first treatment in China? Results from a community health survey in urban areas.

Authors:  Changmin Tang; Zhenni Luo; Pengqian Fang; Fengfan Zhang
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10

Review 4.  A systematic review of barriers to optimal outpatient specialist services for individuals with prevalent chronic diseases: what are the unique and common barriers experienced by patients in high income countries?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Fradgley; Christine L Paul; Jamie Bryant
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-06-09

5.  Patient preferences for hospital quality: case study of iran.

Authors:  Yasser Jouyani; Mina Bahrampour; Mohsen Barouni; Reza Dehnavieh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Ming-Zhu Jiang; Qiang Fu; Ju-Yang Xiong; Xiang-Lin Li; Er-Ping Jia; Ying-Ying Peng; Xiao Shen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Diana M J Delnoij; Roland D Friele; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  Modeling hospital infrastructure by optimizing quality, accessibility and efficiency via a mixed integer programming model.

Authors:  David Ikkersheim; Marit Tanke; Gwendy van Schooten; Niels de Bresser; Hein Fleuren
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Preferences for healthcare services among hypertension patients in China: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Xiaolan Yu; Haini Bao; Jianwei Shi; Xiaoyu Yuan; Liangliang Qian; Zhe Feng; Jinsong Geng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.