BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biliary complications are common after liver transplantation. This study sought to assess the value of hepatic iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scans (hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan) to detect early posttransplantation biliary complications. METHODS: From April 2003 to June 2006, 34 liver transplantations (recipients of mean +/- SD age of 43.0 +/- 15.7 years) were performed in 25 (73.5%) males from 20 (58.8%) cadaveric donors and 14 (41.2%) living-related donors. The subjects underwent HIDA scans using a single head gamma camera Meridian (Philips) after intravenous (IV) administration of 185 MBq Tc-99m Disofenin. The mean time +/- SD posttransplantation to HIDA scan was 14.6 +/- 18.2 days (range, 0-74). The results were compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography, magnetic resonant cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous cholangiograhy, and/or liver biopsy. RESULTS: Twenty-four abnormalities were detected by HIDA scan in 16 patients (47.1%): 10 (29.4%) biliary leaks; 4 (11.4%) biliary obstruction or cholestasis; 1 (2.9%) delayed uptake; 5 (14.7%) delayed blood pool clearance; and 8 (23.5%) delayed transit to the bowel. The complications were more common among living-donor compared with deceased-donor graft recipients, albeit a not statistically significant difference (P = .066). Total and direct bilirubin levels were significantly higher in patients with abnormal than normal HIDA scans (P = .011 and P = .040, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of HIDA scans to detect overall postoperative complications were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Biliary leak results were false positives in 7/10 patients, and true in 3. Detection of obstruction was 75% sensitive by HIDA. CONCLUSION: HIDA scans are a noninvasive, reliable modality for early exclusion of posttransplantation biliary complications. However, correlation with clinical status and imaging modalities is essential to confirm detected abnormalities.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biliary complications are common after liver transplantation. This study sought to assess the value of hepatic iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scans (hepatobiliaryiminodiacetic acid scan) to detect early posttransplantation biliary complications. METHODS: From April 2003 to June 2006, 34 liver transplantations (recipients of mean +/- SD age of 43.0 +/- 15.7 years) were performed in 25 (73.5%) males from 20 (58.8%) cadaveric donors and 14 (41.2%) living-related donors. The subjects underwent HIDA scans using a single head gamma camera Meridian (Philips) after intravenous (IV) administration of 185 MBq Tc-99mDisofenin. The mean time +/- SD posttransplantation to HIDA scan was 14.6 +/- 18.2 days (range, 0-74). The results were compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography, magnetic resonant cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous cholangiograhy, and/or liver biopsy. RESULTS: Twenty-four abnormalities were detected by HIDA scan in 16 patients (47.1%): 10 (29.4%) biliary leaks; 4 (11.4%) biliary obstruction or cholestasis; 1 (2.9%) delayed uptake; 5 (14.7%) delayed blood pool clearance; and 8 (23.5%) delayed transit to the bowel. The complications were more common among living-donor compared with deceased-donor graft recipients, albeit a not statistically significant difference (P = .066). Total and direct bilirubin levels were significantly higher in patients with abnormal than normal HIDA scans (P = .011 and P = .040, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of HIDA scans to detect overall postoperative complications were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Biliary leak results were false positives in 7/10 patients, and true in 3. Detection of obstruction was 75% sensitive by HIDA. CONCLUSION:HIDA scans are a noninvasive, reliable modality for early exclusion of posttransplantation biliary complications. However, correlation with clinical status and imaging modalities is essential to confirm detected abnormalities.