Literature DB >> 19248833

Computational biology - modeling of primary blast effects on the central nervous system.

David F Moore1, Antoine Jérusalem, Michelle Nyein, Ludovic Noels, Michael S Jaffee, Raul A Radovitzky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have highlighted the wartime effect of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The reason for the prominence of TBI in these particular conflicts as opposed to others is unclear but may result from the increased survivability of blast due to improvements in body armor. In the military context blunt, ballistic and blast effects may all contribute to CNS injury, however blast in particular, has been suggested as a primary cause of military TBI. While blast effects on some biological tissues, such as the lung, are documented in terms of injury thresholds, this is not the case for the CNS. We hypothesized that using bio-fidelic models, allowing for fluid-solid interaction and basic material properties available in the literature, a blast wave would interact with CNS tissue and cause a possible concussive effect.
METHODS: The modeling approach employed for this investigation consisted of a computational framework suitable for simulating coupled fluid-solid dynamic interactions. The model included a complex finite element mesh of the head and intra-cranial contents. The effects of threshold and 50% lethal blast lung injury were compared with concussive impact injury using the full head model allowing upper and lower bounds of tissue injury to be applied using pulmonary injury as the reference tissue.
RESULTS: The effects of a 50% lethal dose blast lung injury (LD(50)) were comparable with concussive impact injury using the DVBIC-MIT full head model.
INTERPRETATION: CNS blast concussive effects were found to be similar between impact mild TBI and the blast field associated with LD(50) lung blast injury sustained without personal protective equipment. With the ubiquitous use of personal protective equipment this suggests that blast concussive effects may more readily ascertained in personnel due to enhanced survivability in the current conflicts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19248833     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  42 in total

Review 1.  Neurological effects of blast injury.

Authors:  Ramona R Hicks; Stephanie J Fertig; Rebecca E Desrocher; Walter J Koroshetz; Joseph J Pancrazio
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-05

2.  Computational modelling of lung injury: is there potential for benefit?

Authors:  Daniel J R Harvey; Jonathan G Hardman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  In silico investigation of intracranial blast mitigation with relevance to military traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Michelle K Nyein; Amanda M Jason; Li Yu; Claudio M Pita; John D Joannopoulos; David F Moore; Raul A Radovitzky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Computational modelling of traumatic brain injury predicts the location of chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology.

Authors:  Mazdak Ghajari; Peter J Hellyer; David J Sharp
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Investigation of blast-induced traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Paul A Taylor; John S Ludwigsen; Corey C Ford
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  An animal-to-human scaling law for blast-induced traumatic brain injury risk assessment.

Authors:  Aurélie Jean; Michelle K Nyein; James Q Zheng; David F Moore; John D Joannopoulos; Raúl Radovitzky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation.

Authors:  Silvia Budday; Richard Nay; Rijk de Rooij; Paul Steinmann; Thomas Wyrobek; Timothy C Ovaert; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-03-02

8.  What makes a good head positioner for preventing occipital pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Rona Katzengold; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Which endotracheal tube location minimises the device-related pressure ulcer risk: The centre or a corner of the mouth?

Authors:  Golan Amrani; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 10.  A Review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

Authors:  Caroline Clark; Jeffrey Cole; Christine Winter; Kathy Williams; Geoffrey Grammer
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.