Literature DB >> 19248005

Fetal nasal bone in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11-13 weeks of gestation.

K O Kagan1, S Cicero, I Staboulidou, D Wright, K H Nicolaides.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of first-trimester screening for aneuploidies by including assessment of the fetal nasal bone in the combined test of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency (NT) thickness, fetal heart rate (FHR) and serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A).
METHODS: Screening by the combined test was performed in singleton pregnancies, including 19,614 with euploid fetuses, 122 with trisomy 21, 36 with trisomy 18, 20 with trisomy 13 and eight with Turner syndrome. In all cases the fetal nasal bone was assessed and classified as present or absent. We examined the performance of two screening strategies: firstly, assessment of the nasal bone in all patients and secondly, first-stage screening using the combined test in all patients followed by second-stage assessment of the nasal bone only in those with an intermediate risk of 1 in 51 to 1 in 1000 after the first stage. To validate the new risk algorithm we used a second independent dataset of 19 651 fetuses, including 139 with trisomy 21.
RESULTS: The nasal bone was absent in 2.6% of the euploid fetuses, 59.8% with trisomy 21, 52.8% with trisomy 18, 45.0% with trisomy 13 and in none of the fetuses with Turner syndrome. Respective figures for an absent nasal bone in the validation population, which contained fewer Black women, were 0.6%, 62.6%, 55.3%, 35.3% and 41.7%. In a screening policy based on maternal age, fetal NT, FHR, serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A, for a fixed risk cut-off of 1 : 100, the false-positive rate was 3.0%. The standardized detection rates were 91% for trisomy 21 and 100% for trisomy 18, trisomy 13 and Turner syndrome, respectively. Assessment of the nasal bone in all pregnancies reduced the false-positive rate to 2.5% without changing the detection rate. A detection rate of 93% was achieved with the two-stage strategy at a false-positive rate of 2.4% in which it was necessary to assess the nasal bone in only 15% of the total population. In the validation dataset, screening by the combined test and using a risk cut-off of 1 : 100 detected 90% of the cases with trisomy 21 for a false-positive rate of 4%. Inclusion of the nasal bone increased the detection rate to 92% for a false-positive rate of 2.9%. Contingent screening detected 92% of cases for a false-positive rate of 2.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the fetal nasal bone improves the performance of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19248005     DOI: 10.1002/uog.6318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  18 in total

1.  Normative values of fetal nasal bone lengths of Turkish singleton pregnancies in the first trimester.

Authors:  Murat Yayla; Rahime Nida Ergin; Gökhan Göynümer
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-12-01

2.  Assessment of Foetal DNA in Maternal Blood - A Useful Tool in the Hands of Prenatal Specialists.

Authors:  K O Kagan; M Hoopmann; P Kozlowski
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

4.  Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study.

Authors:  Rossa W K Chiu; Ranjit Akolekar; Yama W L Zheng; Tak Y Leung; Hao Sun; K C Allen Chan; Fiona M F Lun; Attie T J I Go; Elizabeth T Lau; William W K To; Wing C Leung; Rebecca Y K Tang; Sidney K C Au-Yeung; Helena Lam; Yu Y Kung; Xiuqing Zhang; John M G van Vugt; Ryoko Minekawa; Mary H Y Tang; Jun Wang; Cees B M Oudejans; Tze K Lau; Kypros H Nicolaides; Y M Dennis Lo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-11

5.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Screen for Trisomy 21 During the First Trimester From Nuchal Ultrasonographic Images.

Authors:  Liwen Zhang; Di Dong; Yongqing Sun; Chaoen Hu; Congxin Sun; Qingqing Wu; Jie Tian
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 6.  Imaging findings in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Rupa Radhakrishnan; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-04-16

7.  NSGC practice guideline: prenatal screening and diagnostic testing options for chromosome aneuploidy.

Authors:  K L Wilson; J L Czerwinski; J M Hoskovec; S J Noblin; C M Sullivan; A Harbison; M W Campion; K Devary; P Devers; C N Singletary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Empirical assessment of bias in machine learning diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Ryan J Crowley; Yuan Jin Tan; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  First-Trimester Fetal Hepatic Artery Examination for Adverse Outcome Prediction.

Authors:  Bartosz Czuba; Piotr Tousty; Wojciech Cnota; Dariusz Borowski; Agnieszka Jagielska; Mariusz Dubiel; Anna Fuchs; Magda Fraszczyk-Tousty; Sylwia Dzidek; Anna Kajdy; Grzegorz Świercz; Sebastian Kwiatkowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 10.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.