Literature DB >> 19247577

Does a national screening programme reduce socioeconomic inequalities in mammography use?

Marina Puddu1, Stefaan Demarest, Jean Tafforeau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate possible changes in socioeconomic inequalities in mammography use among women aged 50-69 years between the start of the Belgian national screening programme in 2001 and three years later (2004), and to assess if the implementation of an organised screening programme has been successful in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of mammography.
METHODS: Data was obtained from the 2001 and 2004 Health Interview Survey. Data were analysed by logistic regression with educational level as proxy for the socioeconomic status. The gradient of socioeconomic inequalities was estimated with the relative index of inequality.
RESULTS: Despite a substantial increase in the use of mammography from 59% in 2001 to 71% in 2004, a variation in the coverage according to educational level was detected: women with lower education were less likely to undergo mammography than those with higher education [(OR 1.93 (95% CI 1.21-3.09 in 2001 and 2.21 (95% CI 1.37-3.56) in 2004].
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in breast screening uptake seem to persist 3 years after the implementation of the national screening programme. Although the national programme improved the coverage, it could not counteract the socioeconomic gradients in the use of mammography. Additional work is needed to identify effective methods of decreasing socioeconomic inequalities in mammography use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19247577     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-8105-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  15 in total

1.  Health inequalities and regional specific scarcity in primary care physicians: ethical issues and criteria.

Authors:  Greg Stapleton; Peter Schröder-Bäck; Helmut Brand; David Townend
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Breast Cancer and Socioeconomic Status in Austria.

Authors:  Ursula Kunze; Gabriela Böhm
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The effects of organized screening programs on the demand for mammography in Switzerland.

Authors:  Mark Pletscher
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-11-08

4.  Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France).

Authors:  Celine Audiger; Thomas Bovagnet; Julia Bardes; Gaelle Abihsera; Jerome Nicolet; Michel Deghaye; Audrey Bochaton; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.100

5.  Age differences in mammography screening reconsidered: life course trajectories in 13 European countries.

Authors:  Sarah Missinne; Piet Bracke
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Gianfranco Damiani; Bruno Federico; Danila Basso; Alessandra Ronconi; Caterina Bianca Neve Aurora Bianchi; Gian Marco Anzellotti; Gabriella Nasi; Franco Sassi; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Participation in breast cancer screening among women of Turkish origin in Germany - a register-based study.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Berens; Lisa Stahl; Yüce Yilmaz-Aslan; Odile Sauzet; Jacob Spallek; Oliver Razum
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Changes in the magnitude of social inequality in the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Taiwan, a country implementing a population-based organized screening program.

Authors:  Shu-Ti Chiou; Chien-Yuan Wu; Baai-Shyun Hurng; Tsung-Hsueh Lu
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2014-01-09

9.  A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Berens; Maren Reder; Petra Kolip; Jacob Spallek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening services in Korea, 1998-2012.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Jongnam Hwang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.