Atle Klovning1, Hogne Sandvik, Steinar Hunskaar. 1. Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien, Bergen, Norway. atle.klovning@medisin.uio.no
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess how web-based recruitment is comparable to postal surveys. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In 2002, we invited female users of major Norwegian websites to join a women's health study on the Internet. The results of this study on the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) were compared with similar data collected by post in a previous epidemiological study, EPINCONT (Epidemiology of Urinary Incontinence in Nord-Trøndelag). RESULTS: Altogether 1,812 web respondents compared with 27,936 postal respondents from the EPINCONT study. The Internet sample was younger than the EPINCONT sample (37 vs. 48 years, P<0.05). The proportion of women 60 years or older was 3.3% in our study and 29.0% in the EPINCONT study. Unadjusted prevalence of UI was lower in our study (20%) than in the EPINCONT study (25%), but stratified prevalence rates were higher in all individual age groups. In the Internet sample, we found less slight UI in all age groups, and more moderate (30-39 and 50-59-year age groups) and severe UI (30-39, 40-49, and 50-59-year age groups). CONCLUSION: We attracted a younger population with more severe UI than the EPINCONT study. Web-based approaches are less appropriate for studies on conditions concerning the older population than postal methods.
OBJECTIVE: To assess how web-based recruitment is comparable to postal surveys. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In 2002, we invited female users of major Norwegian websites to join a women's health study on the Internet. The results of this study on the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) were compared with similar data collected by post in a previous epidemiological study, EPINCONT (Epidemiology of Urinary Incontinence in Nord-Trøndelag). RESULTS: Altogether 1,812 web respondents compared with 27,936 postal respondents from the EPINCONT study. The Internet sample was younger than the EPINCONT sample (37 vs. 48 years, P<0.05). The proportion of women 60 years or older was 3.3% in our study and 29.0% in the EPINCONT study. Unadjusted prevalence of UI was lower in our study (20%) than in the EPINCONT study (25%), but stratified prevalence rates were higher in all individual age groups. In the Internet sample, we found less slight UI in all age groups, and more moderate (30-39 and 50-59-year age groups) and severe UI (30-39, 40-49, and 50-59-year age groups). CONCLUSION: We attracted a younger population with more severe UI than the EPINCONT study. Web-based approaches are less appropriate for studies on conditions concerning the older population than postal methods.
Authors: Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue; Kathryn J Aikin; Dhuly Chowdhury; Rebecca R Moultrie; Douglas J Rupert Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-12-22
Authors: Alan W Shindel; Tami S Rowen; Tzu-Chun Lin; Chin-Shang Li; Patricia A Robertson; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Benjamin N Breyer; Eric Vittinghoff; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Bradley A Erickson; Alan W Shindel Journal: Urology Date: 2011-10-02 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Crystelle A Egan; Susan E Marakovitz; Julia A O'Rourke; Lisa Osiecki; Cornelia Illmann; Lauren Barton; Elizabeth McLaughlin; Rachel Proujansky; Justin Royal; Heather Cowley; Martha Rangel-Lugo; David L Pauls; Jeremiah M Scharf; Carol A Mathews Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Tami S Rowen; Benjamin N Breyer; Tzu-Chin Lin; Chin-Shang Li; Patricia A Robertson; Alan W Shindel Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: John Gallacher; Rory Collins; Paul Elliott; Stephen Palmer; Paul Burton; Clive Mitchell; Gareth John; Ronan Lyons Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240