Literature DB >> 26749356

Visual presentations of efficacy data in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print and television advertisements: A randomized study.

Helen W Sullivan1, Amie C O'Donoghue2, Kathryn J Aikin2, Dhuly Chowdhury3, Rebecca R Moultrie3, Douglas J Rupert3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether visual aids help people recall quantitative efficacy information in direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertisements, and if so, which types of visual aids are most helpful.
METHODS: Individuals diagnosed with high cholesterol (n=2504) were randomized to view a fictional DTC print or television advertisement with no visual aid or one of four visual aids (pie chart, bar chart, table, or pictograph) depicting drug efficacy. We measured drug efficacy and risk recall, drug perceptions and attitudes, and behavioral intentions.
RESULTS: For print advertisements, a bar chart or table, compared with no visual aid, elicited more accurate drug efficacy recall. The bar chart was better at this than the pictograph and the table was better than the pie chart. For television advertisements, any visual aid, compared with no visual aid, elicited more accurate drug efficacy recall. The bar chart was better at this than the pictograph or the table.
CONCLUSION: Visual aids depicting quantitative efficacy information in DTC print and television advertisements increased drug efficacy recall, which may help people make informed decisions about prescription drugs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Adding visual aids to DTC advertising may increase the public's knowledge of how well prescription drugs work. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communication; Direct-to-consumer advertising; Quantitative information

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26749356      PMCID: PMC7285816          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  23 in total

1.  Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs: what are Americans being sold?

Authors:  S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; J Tremmel; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Ann Dixon; Andrew Hayen; Jesse Jansen; Sian Smith; Judy M Simpson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Risk avoidance: graphs versus numbers.

Authors:  Hannah Faye Chua; J Frank Yates; Priti Shah
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin; W C Black; H G Welch
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The greater ability of graphical versus numerical displays to increase risk avoidance involves a common mechanism.

Authors:  James A Schirillo; Eric R Stone
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  The drug facts box: providing consumers with simple tabular data on drug benefit and harm.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  The value of benefit data in direct-to-consumer drug ads.

Authors:  Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-Accuracy, comprehension and preferences.

Authors:  Melanie Price; Rachel Cameron; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-10-01

10.  Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.

Authors:  Carmen Keller; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing the Inclusion of Foil Items in a Scale to Measure Recognition of Health Messages.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Wen-Hung Chen; Kevin R Betts
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2021-07-03

2.  Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.

Authors:  Edward R Melnick; Marc A Probst; Elizabeth Schoenfeld; Sean P Collins; Maggie Breslin; Cheryl Walsh; Nathan Kuppermann; Pat Dunn; Benjamin S Abella; Dowin Boatright; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Assessing hearing and cognition challenges in consumer processing of televised risk information: Validation of self-reported measures using performance indicators.

Authors:  Brian G Southwell; Sarah A Parvanta; Mihaela M Johnson; Amie C O'Donoghue; Helen W Sullivan; Sarah E Ray; Cynthia S Soloe; Christine N Davis; Nancy McKenna
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-06-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.