Literature DB >> 19245601

First-in-human trial participants: not a vulnerable population, but vulnerable nonetheless.

Rebecca Dresser1.   

Abstract

The 21st-century translational science campaign could lead to an increase in first-in-human (FIH) trials. As tests of investigational interventions move from the laboratory to human research, scientists, officials, and review committees should address ongoing concerns about the ethics of FIH trials. In this article, I describe three ethical considerations relevant to all FIH trials: (1) the requirement for adequate preclinical research; (2) study design safeguards; and (3) choice of subject population. I also examine specific ethical considerations relevant to the three subject populations (healthy volunteers, seriously ill patients lacking standard treatment options, and stable patients) involved in FIH research. I recommend a variety of actions that could increase subject protection and the value of the information generated in FIH trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19245601      PMCID: PMC2692671          DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00349.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  59 in total

1.  To screen new drugs for safety, Lilly pays homeless alcoholics: it's 'quick cash' to habitues of Indianapolis shelters; it vanishes quickly, too.

Authors:  Laurie P Cohen
Journal:  Wall St J (East Ed)       Date:  1996-11-14

2.  On trial.

Authors:  R John Davenport
Journal:  Sci Aging Knowledge Environ       Date:  2004-06-16

3.  Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision.

Authors:  Elias A Zerhouni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Consent forms and the therapeutic misconception: the example of gene transfer research.

Authors:  Nancy M P King; Gail E Henderson; Larry R Churchill; Arlene M Davis; Sara Chandros Hull; Daniel K Nelson; P Christy Parham-Vetter; Barbara Bluestone Rothschild; Michele M Easter; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

5.  Justice in translation: from bench to bedside in the developing world.

Authors:  Alex John London; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Thomas G Roberts; Bernardo H Goulart; Lee Squitieri; Sarah C Stallings; Elkan F Halpern; Bruce A Chabner; G Scott Gazelle; Stan N Finkelstein; Jeffrey W Clark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.

Authors:  Elizabeth Horstmann; Mary S McCabe; Louise Grochow; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Larry Rubinstein; Troy Budd; Dale Shoemaker; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Pet models in cancer research: general principles.

Authors:  A Porrello; P Cardelli; E P Spugnini
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06

Review 9.  First-in-Man (FIM) clinical trials post-TeGenero: a review of the impact of the TeGenero trial on the design, conduct, and ethics of FIM trials.

Authors:  Adel Nada; John Somberg
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.688

10.  Translational Medicine: A two-way road.

Authors:  Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  26 in total

1.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Laura A Levit; Peter C Adamson; Suanna Bruinooge; Howard A Burris; Michael A Carducci; Adam P Dicker; Mithat Gönen; Stephen M Keefe; Michael A Postow; Michael A Thompson; David M Waterhouse; Susan L Weiner; Lynn M Schuchter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The risk-escalation model: a principled design strategy for early-phase trials.

Authors:  Spencer Phillips Hey; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2014-06

3.  One Size Fits All?: Ethical Considerations for Examining Efficacy in First-in-Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Studies.

Authors:  Michelle Gjl Habets; Johannes Jm van Delden; Sophie L Niemansburg; Harold L Atkins; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  The ethics of HIV "cure" research: what can we learn from consent forms?

Authors:  Gail E Henderson
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.205

5.  Stakeholder views on participant selection for first-in-human trials in cancer nanomedicine.

Authors:  P Satalkar; B S Elger; D M Shaw
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  "I had already made up my mind": patients and caregivers' perspectives on making the decision to participate in research at a US cancer referral center.

Authors:  Kathleen Shannon-Dorcy; Denise J Drevdahl
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Autonomy and Fear of Synthetic Biology: How Can Patients' Autonomy Be Enhanced in the Field of Synthetic Biology? A Qualitative Study with Stable Patients.

Authors:  Milenko Rakic; Isabelle Wienand; David Shaw; Rebecca Nast; Bernice S Elger
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Building an ethical foundation for first-in-human nanotrials.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  A FIM study to assess safety and exposure of inhaled single doses of AP301-A specific ENaC channel activator for the treatment of acute lung injury.

Authors:  Richard Schwameis; Sandra Eder; Helmut Pietschmann; Bernhard Fischer; Hermann Mascher; Susan Tzotzos; Hendrik Fischer; Rudolf Lucas; Markus Zeitlinger; Robert Hermann
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  Stem cell trials for cardiovascular medicine: ethical rationale.

Authors:  Sophie L Niemansburg; Martin Teraa; Husna Hesam; Johannes J M van Delden; Marianne C Verhaar; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.