Literature DB >> 19245491

Conservation of marine megafauna through minimization of fisheries bycatch.

Ramūnas Žydelis1, Bryan P Wallace, Eric L Gilman, Timothy B Werner.   

Abstract

Many populations of marine megafauna, including seabirds, sea turtles, marine mammals, and elasmobranchs, have declined in recent decades due largely to anthropogenic mortality. To successfully conserve these long-lived animals, efforts must be prioritized according to feasibility and the degree to which they address threats with the highest relative impacts on population dynamics. Recently, Wilcox and Donlan (2007, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment) and Donlan and Wilcox (2008, Biological Invasions) proposed a conservation strategy of "compensatory mitigation" in which fishing industries offset bycatch of seabirds and sea turtles by funding eradication of invasive mammalian predators from the terrestrial reproductive sites of these marine animals. Although this is a creative and conceptually compelling approach, we find it flawed as a conservation tool because it has narrow applicability among marine megafauna, it does not address the most pervasive threats to marine megafauna, and it is logistically and financially infeasible. Invasive predator eradication does not adequately offset the most pressing threat to most marine megafauna populations--fisheries bycatch. For seabird populations, fisheries bycatch and invasive predators infrequently are overlapping threats. Invasive predators have limited population-level impacts on sea turtles and marine mammals and no impacts on elasmobranchs, all of which are threatened by bycatch. Implementing compensatory mitigation in marine fisheries is unrealistic due to inadequate monitoring, control, and surveillance in the majority of fleets. Therefore, offsetting fisheries bycatch with eradication of invasive predators would be less likely to reverse population declines than reducing bycatch. We recommend that efforts to mitigate bycatch in marine capture fisheries should address multiple threats to sensitive bycatch species groups, but these efforts should first institute proven bycatch avoidance and reduction methods before considering compensatory mitigation. ©2009 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19245491     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01172.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bycatch levies could reconcile trade-offs between blue growth and biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Hollie Booth; William N S Arlidge; Dale Squires; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Biodiversity offsets: a cost-effective interim solution to seabird bycatch in fisheries?

Authors:  Sean Pascoe; Chris Wilcox; C Josh Donlan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Phylogenetic analysis of conservation priorities for aquatic mammals and their terrestrial relatives, with a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Laura J May-Collado; Ingi Agnarsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  DNA Barcode Reveals the Bycatch of Endangered Batoids Species in the Southwest Atlantic: Implications for Sustainable Fisheries Management and Conservation Efforts.

Authors:  Bruno Lopes da Silva Ferrette; Rodrigo Rodrigues Domingues; Matheus Marcos Rotundo; Marina Provetti Miranda; Ingrid Vasconcellos Bunholi; Juliana Beltramin De Biasi; Claudio Oliveira; Fausto Foresti; Fernando Fernandes Mendonça
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Separating the effects of climate, bycatch, predation and harvesting on tītī (Ardenna grisea) population dynamics in New Zealand: A model-based assessment.

Authors:  Sam McKechnie; David Fletcher; Jamie Newman; Corey Bragg; Peter W Dillingham; Rosemary Clucas; Darren Scott; Sebastian Uhlmann; Phil Lyver; Andrew Gormley; Henrik Moller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessment of Caspian Seal By-Catch in an Illegal Fishery Using an Interview-Based Approach.

Authors:  Lilia Dmitrieva; Andrey A Kondakov; Eugeny Oleynikov; Aidyn Kydyrmanov; Kobey Karamendin; Yesbol Kasimbekov; Mirgaliy Baimukanov; Susan Wilson; Simon J Goodman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lessons from seabird conservation in Alaskan longline fisheries.

Authors:  Edward F Melvin; Kimberly S Dietrich; Robert M Suryan; Shannon M Fitzgerald
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.560

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.