Literature DB >> 19244038

Large-core breast biopsy: abnormal salivary cortisol profiles associated with uncertainty of diagnosis.

Elvira V Lang1, Kevin S Berbaum, Susan K Lutgendorf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether uncertainty of the diagnosis after large-core breast biopsy (LCBB) adversely affects biochemical stress levels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant, and all patients gave written informed consent. One hundred fifty women aged 18-86 years collected four salivary cortisol samples per day for 5 days after LCBB. t Tests were used to compare diurnal cortisol slopes among three groups: patients who did not have a final diagnosis (uncertain group), patients who knew they had cancer (known malignant group), and patients who knew they had benign disease (known benign group).
RESULTS: Women learned their diagnosis on days 1-6 (mean, day 2.4) after LCBB. Analysis was truncated at day 5, when the data from a sufficient number of patients from each group were available for meaningful analysis: 16 patients from the known malignant group, 37 from the known benign group, and 73 from the uncertain group, which totaled 126 patients. The mean cortisol slope for the women with an uncertain diagnosis (-0.092 ln [microg/dL]/hr; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.113 ln [microg/dL]/hr, -0.072 ln [microg/dL]/hr) was significantly flatter (less desirable) than that for the women who learned that they had benign disease (-0.154 ln [microg/dL]/hr; 95% CI: -0.197 ln [microg/dL]/hr, -0.111 ln [microg/dL]/hr; P = .014) but not significantly different from that for the women who learned that they had malignant disease (-0.110 ln [microg/dL]/hr; 95% CI: -0.147 ln [microg/dL]/hr, -0.073 ln [microg/dL]/hr; P = .421).
CONCLUSION: Uncertainty about the final diagnosis after LCBB is associated with substantial biochemical distress, which may have adverse effects on immune defense and wound healing. Results indicate the need for more rapid communication of biopsy results. RSNA, 2009

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19244038     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2503081087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Is waiting bad for subjective health?

Authors:  Jennifer L Howell; Kate Sweeny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-03-11

2.  An evaluation of patient experience during percutaneous breast biopsy.

Authors:  Jean M Seely; Fraser Hill; Susan Peddle; Jackie Lau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Luminita A Tudorica; Xin Li; Sunitha B Thakur; Yiyi Chen; Elizabeth A Morris; Ian J Tagge; Maayan E Korenblit; William D Rooney; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Distress in the radiology waiting room.

Authors:  Nicole Flory; Elvira V Lang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  A Better Patient Experience Through Better Communication.

Authors:  Elvira V Lang
Journal:  J Radiol Nurs       Date:  2012-12-01

6.  Development of a practical spatial-spectral analysis protocol for breast histopathology using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  F Nell Pounder; Rohith K Reddy; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.008

7.  Pursuing optimal thresholds to recommend breast biopsy by quantifying the value of tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Oguzhan Alagoz; David J Vanness; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-11

8.  Evaluation of Stress Scores Throughout Radiological Biopsies.

Authors:  Ozlem Turkoglu; Hasan Huseyin Mutlu
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Variation in Results Release and Patient Portal Access to Diagnostic Test Results at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Matthew D Krasowski; Caleb V Grieme; Brian Cassady; Nicholas R Dreyer; Karolyn A Wanat; Maia Hightower; Kenneth G Nepple
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-11-23

10.  The Impact of Pre-Operative Breast MRI on Surgical Waiting Time.

Authors:  Michelle Zhang; Simon Sun; Benoît Mesurolle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.