PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of in vivo diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to distinguish between normal liver, viable tumor and necrosis compared to postmortem DWI in a rat model with vascular-targeting treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen rats with liver implantation of 30 rhabdomyosarcomas were treated with combretastatin A-4-phosphate (CA4P) at 10 mg/kg. Two days after treatment, T2-weighted imaging, precontrast T1-weighted imaging, postcontrast T1-weighted imaging, and DWI were performed in vivo and postmortem with a 1.5T scanner. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) calculated from DWIs with b values of 0, 50, and 100 seconds/mm2 (ADClow), 500, 750, and 1000 seconds/mm2 (ADChigh), 0, 500, and 1000 seconds/mm2 (ADC3b), and 0-1000 seconds/mm2 (ADC10b) for tumor, liver, therapeutic necrosis, and phantoms were compared and validated with ex vivo microangiographic and histopathologic findings. RESULTS: Except ADClow between tumor and necrosis, in vivo ADCs successfully differentiated liver, viable tumor, and necrosis (P<0.05). Compared to in vivo outcomes, postmortem ADCs significantly dropped in tumor and liver (P<0.05) except ADChigh of tumor, but not in necrosis and phantoms. Compared to ADClow, ADChigh was less affected by vital status. CONCLUSION: Advantageous over postmortem DWI, in vivo DWI provides a noninvasive easy-performing tool for distinguishing between liver, viable tumor, and necrosis. ADClow and ADChigh better reflect tissue perfusion and water diffusion, respectively. Copyright (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of in vivo diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to distinguish between normal liver, viable tumor and necrosis compared to postmortem DWI in a rat model with vascular-targeting treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen rats with liver implantation of 30 rhabdomyosarcomas were treated with combretastatin A-4-phosphate (CA4P) at 10 mg/kg. Two days after treatment, T2-weighted imaging, precontrast T1-weighted imaging, postcontrast T1-weighted imaging, and DWI were performed in vivo and postmortem with a 1.5T scanner. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) calculated from DWIs with b values of 0, 50, and 100 seconds/mm2 (ADClow), 500, 750, and 1000 seconds/mm2 (ADChigh), 0, 500, and 1000 seconds/mm2 (ADC3b), and 0-1000 seconds/mm2 (ADC10b) for tumor, liver, therapeutic necrosis, and phantoms were compared and validated with ex vivo microangiographic and histopathologic findings. RESULTS: Except ADClow between tumor and necrosis, in vivo ADCs successfully differentiated liver, viable tumor, and necrosis (P<0.05). Compared to in vivo outcomes, postmortem ADCs significantly dropped in tumor and liver (P<0.05) except ADChigh of tumor, but not in necrosis and phantoms. Compared to ADClow, ADChigh was less affected by vital status. CONCLUSION: Advantageous over postmortem DWI, in vivo DWI provides a noninvasive easy-performing tool for distinguishing between liver, viable tumor, and necrosis. ADClow and ADChigh better reflect tissue perfusion and water diffusion, respectively. Copyright (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Yewei Liu; Ting Yin; Yuanbo Feng; Marlein Miranda Cona; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu; Shaoli Song; Yansheng Jiang; Qian Xia; Johannes V Swinnen; Guy Bormans; Uwe Himmelreich; Raymond Oyen; Yicheng Ni Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2015-10
Authors: Feng Chen; Frederik De Keyzer; Yuan-Bo Feng; Marlein Miranda Cona; Jie Yu; Guy Marchal; Raymond Oyen; Yi-Cheng Ni Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Owen J Arthurs; Gemma C Price; David W Carmichael; Rod Jones; Wendy Norman; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Xiaobing Fan; Kay Macleod; Devkumar Mustafi; Suzanne D Conzen; Erica Markiewicz; Marta Zamora; James Vosicky; Jeffrey Mueller; Gregory S Karczmar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 3.240