Literature DB >> 19243055

Biliary anatomy on 3D MRCP: Comparison of volume-rendering and maximum-intensity-projection algorithms.

Satoru Morita1, Naoko Saito, Kazufumi Suzuki, Norio Mitsuhashi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare volume-rendering (VR) and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) of three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction (3D-TSE-PACE-MRCP) to define biliary anatomies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: VR and MIP images of 3D-TSE-PACE-MRCP for 102 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Interpretation of cystic duct variation and biliary branching patterns of each image were recorded independently by two radiologists in a blinded fashion. Interpretation confidence on a five-point scale was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The McNemar test was used to compare the accuracies of each reformation with the reference standard obtained by consensus interpretation of both the images and source images.
RESULTS: The reference standard identified all biliary bifurcations and 95 of 102 cystic duct confluences (93.1%). VR findings agreed with the reference standard findings more often than MIP with regard to cystic duct variation (94 [92.2%] vs. 76 [74.5%], P<0.01) while there was no significant difference for biliary branching patterns (99 [97.1%] vs. 92 [90.2%], P=0.092). The mean confidence score was significantly higher with VR than MIP with regard to both cystic duct variation and biliary branching patterns (3.7 vs. 2.4; P<0.01; 4.1 vs. 3.3; P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: VR reformation of 3D-TSE-PACE-MRCP defines biliary anatomies more accurately than MIP. Copyright (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19243055     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  2 in total

Review 1.  CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree.

Authors:  T Hyodo; S Kumano; F Kushihata; M Okada; M Hirata; T Tsuda; Y Takada; T Mochizuki; T Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  3D-MRCP for evaluation of intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts: comparison of different acquisition and reconstruction planes.

Authors:  Kristina Imeen Ringe; Dagmar Hartung; Christian von Falck; Frank Wacker; Hans-Jürgen Raatschen
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.930

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.