PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a computer-assisted method for assessing the quantity and distribution of adipose tissue in thigh by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty obese subjects were imaged on a Philips Achieva 1.5T scanner by a fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence. A total of 636 images were acquired and analyzed by custom-made software. Thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and bone were identified by fuzzy clustering segmentation and an active contour algorithm. Muscle and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) were assessed by identifying the two peaks of the signal histogram with an expectation maximization algorithm. The whole analysis was performed in an unsupervised manner without the need of any user interaction. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation (CV) was evaluated between the unsupervised algorithm and manual analysis performed by an expert operator. The CV was low for all measurements (SAT<2%, muscle<1%, IMAT<5%). Limited manual correction of unsupervised segmentation results (less than 10% of contours modified) allowed us to further reduce the CV (SAT<0.5%, muscle<0.5%, IMAT<2%). CONCLUSION: The proposed approach allowed effective computer-assisted analysis of thigh MR images, dramatically reducing the user work compared to manual analysis. It allowed routine assessment of IMAT, a fat-depot linked with metabolic abnormalities, important in monitoring the effect of nutrition and exercise. Copyright (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a computer-assisted method for assessing the quantity and distribution of adipose tissue in thigh by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty obese subjects were imaged on a Philips Achieva 1.5T scanner by a fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence. A total of 636 images were acquired and analyzed by custom-made software. Thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and bone were identified by fuzzy clustering segmentation and an active contour algorithm. Muscle and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) were assessed by identifying the two peaks of the signal histogram with an expectation maximization algorithm. The whole analysis was performed in an unsupervised manner without the need of any user interaction. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation (CV) was evaluated between the unsupervised algorithm and manual analysis performed by an expert operator. The CV was low for all measurements (SAT<2%, muscle<1%, IMAT<5%). Limited manual correction of unsupervised segmentation results (less than 10% of contours modified) allowed us to further reduce the CV (SAT<0.5%, muscle<0.5%, IMAT<2%). CONCLUSION: The proposed approach allowed effective computer-assisted analysis of thigh MR images, dramatically reducing the user work compared to manual analysis. It allowed routine assessment of IMAT, a fat-depot linked with metabolic abnormalities, important in monitoring the effect of nutrition and exercise. Copyright (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Michael I Polkey; Jens Praestgaard; Amy Berwick; Frits M E Franssen; Dave Singh; Michael C Steiner; Richard Casaburi; Hanns-Christian Tillmann; Estelle Lach-Trifilieff; Ronenn Roubenoff; Daniel S Rooks Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Benjamin Leporq; Arnaud Le Troter; Yann Le Fur; Emmanuelle Salort-Campana; Maxime Guye; Olivier Beuf; Shahram Attarian; David Bendahan Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Mansour Ghasemikaram; Oliver Chaudry; Armin M Nagel; Michael Uder; Franz Jakob; Wolfgang Kemmler; Matthias Kohl; Klaus Engelke Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum; Lorenzo Nardo; Hamza Alizai; Huanzhou Yu; Julio Carballido-Gamio; S Paran Yap; Ann Shimakawa; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.813