Literature DB >> 19242686

The common magnitude code underlying numerical and size processing for action but not for perception.

Rocco Y-C Chiou1, Erik C Chang, Ovid J-L Tzeng, Denise H Wu.   

Abstract

The interaction between numbers and action-related process has received increasing attention in the literature of numerical cognition. In the current study, two dual-task experiments were conducted to explore the interaction among numerical, prehension, and perceptual color/size judgments. The results revealed the commonality and distinctness of the magnitude representations that are involved in these tasks. Specifically, a photograph of a graspable object with a superimposed Arabic digit was presented in each trial. Participants were required to first judge the parity of the digit with a manual response while simultaneously planning a subsequent vocal response pertaining to the depicted object. When parity and action judgments were performed close in time, the compatibility effect between the numerical magnitude of the digit and the appropriate action (pinch vs. clutch) for the object was demonstrated in both manual and vocal responses. In contrast, such compatibility effect was absent when parity judgment was coupled with color-related or perceptual size judgment. The findings of the current study support the existence of a common magnitude code underlying numerical and non-numerical dimensions for action-related purposes, as proposed by the ATOM model (Walsh in Trends Cogn Sci 7:483-488, 2003). Furthermore, based on the selective presence of the compatibility effect, we argue that the interaction among different quantity dimensions conforms to the "dorsal-action and ventral-perception" organizational principle of the human brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242686     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1730-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.

Authors:  Marion L Kellenbach; Matthew Brett; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Alan D Castel; Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction.

Authors:  Michael Andres; Marco Davare; Mauro Pesenti; Etienne Olivier; Xavier Seron
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The influence of task instruction on action coding: constraint setting or direct coding?

Authors:  Dorit Wenke; Peter A Frensch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Bonnie Kwan; Bruno L Giordano; Carlo Umiltà; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

Review 6.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line.

Authors:  Ivilin Stoianov; Peter Kramer; Carlo Umiltà; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-06-06

8.  The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Nicola Canessa; Francesca Borgo; Stefano F Cappa; Daniela Perani; Andrea Falini; Giovanni Buccino; Marco Tettamanti; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping.

Authors:  Michael Andres; David J Ostry; Florence Nicol; Tomas Paus
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 10.  The representation of numerical magnitude.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  15 in total

1.  Numbers can move our hands: a spatial representation effect in digits handwriting.

Authors:  Gelsomina Perrone; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Emanuela Bricolo; Luisa Girelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Iring Koch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-23

3.  Selective interference of grasp and space representations with number magnitude and serial order processing.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Wim Fias; Michael Andres
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

4.  Numerical magnitude affects online execution, and not planning of visuomotor control.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-01-20

5.  Influence of finger and mouth action observation on random number generation: an instance of embodied cognition for abstract concepts.

Authors:  Stéphane Grade; Arnaud Badets; Mauro Pesenti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Influence of numerical magnitudes on the free choice of an object position.

Authors:  Claudia Gianelli; Mariagrazia Ranzini; Michele Marzocchi; Leticìa Rettore Micheli; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

7.  Creating semantics in tool use.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Thomas Michelet; Aymar de Rugy; François Osiurak
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-02-21

8.  Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses.

Authors:  Andrea J Sell; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  The comprehension of sentences involving quantity information affects responses on the up-down axis.

Authors:  Andrea J Sell; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

10.  Counting is easier while experiencing a congruent motion.

Authors:  Luisa Lugli; Giulia Baroni; Filomena Anelli; Anna M Borghi; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.