Literature DB >> 19242624

Orthopaedic manual therapy, McKenzie method or advice only for low back pain in working adults: a randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up.

Markku Paatelma1, Sinikka Kilpikoski, Riitta Simonen, Ari Heinonen, Markku Alen, Tapio Videman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of 2 manual therapy methods compared with one counselling session with a physiotherapist with "advice-only to stay active" for treating low back pain/leg pain and disability.
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial with a 1-year follow-up.
SUBJECTS: A total of 134 subjects with low back disorders.
METHODS: Participants with acute to chronic first or recurrent low back pain, excluding those with "red flag" criteria, were assigned randomly to one of the 3 intervention groups: an orthopaedic manual therapy group (n=45), a McKenzie method group (n=52), and an "advice only to be active" group (advice-only) (n=37). Data on leg and low back pain intensity and disability (Roland-Morris Disability questionnaire) were collected at baseline, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up points.
RESULTS: At the 3-month follow-up point, significant improvements had occurred in all groups in leg and low back pain and in the disability index, but with no significant differences between the groups. At the 6-month follow-up, leg pain (-15 mm; 95% confidence interval (CI) -30 to -1), back pain (effect: -15 mm; -27 to -4), and disability index (-4 points; -7 to -1) improved (p < 0.05) more in the McKenzie method group than in the advice-only group. At the 1-year follow-up, the McKenzie method group had (p=0.028) a better disability index (-3 points; -6 to 0) than did the advice-only group. In the orthopaedic manual therapy group at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits, improvements in the pain and disability index were somewhat better than in the advice-only group (p=0.067 and 0.068, respectively). No differences emerged between the orthopaedic manual therapy and McKenzie method groups in pain- and disability-score changes at any follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The orthopaedic manual therapy and McKenzie methods seemed to be only marginally more effective than was one session of assessment and advice-only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19242624     DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  25 in total

1.  Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trials.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Charles Sheets
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

2.  National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Mette Jensen Stochkendahl; Per Kjaer; Jan Hartvigsen; Alice Kongsted; Jens Aaboe; Margrethe Andersen; Mikkel Ø Andersen; Gilles Fournier; Betina Højgaard; Martin Bach Jensen; Lone Donbæk Jensen; Ture Karbo; Lilli Kirkeskov; Martin Melbye; Lone Morsel-Carlsen; Jan Nordsteen; Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson; Zoreh Rasti; Peter Frost Silbye; Morten Zebitz Steiness; Simon Tarp; Morten Vaagholt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinician's ability to identify neck and low back interventions: an inter-rater chance-corrected agreement pilot study.

Authors:  Mark W Werneke; Dennis L Hart; Daniel Deutscher; Paul W Stratford
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-08

4.  Inter-tester Reliability in Classifying Acute and Subacute Low Back Pain Patients into Clinical Subgroups: A Comparison of Specialists and Non-Specialists. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Markku Paatelma; Eira Karvqnen; Ari Heinqnen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

5.  What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Man Hung; Charles L Saltzman; Richard Kendall; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren W Voss; Brandon Lawrence; Ryan Spiker; Darrel Brodke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Directional preference constructs for patients' low back pain in the absence of centralization.

Authors:  Richard Yarznbowicz; Minjing Tao
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-08-06

7.  The long-term effects of naprapathic manual therapy on back and neck pain - results from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eva Skillgate; Tony Bohman; Lena W Holm; Eva Vingård; Lars Alfredsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The Effect of Harmonic Technique vs End Range Loading Exercises on Pain and Disability in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Amir Massoud Arab; Heidar Saadati; Rahman Sheikhhoseini
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-25

9.  Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) instruments in patients with spinal disorders.

Authors:  Man Hung; Charles L Saltzman; Maren W Voss; Jerry Bounsanga; Richard Kendall; Ryan Spiker; Brandon Lawrence; Darrel Brodke
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Clinical effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review and update of UK evidence report.

Authors:  Christine Clar; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Rachel Court; Gillian Lewando Hundt; Aileen Clarke; Paul Sutcliffe
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.