Literature DB >> 19242324

Percutaneous left ventricular assist in ischemic cardiac arrest.

Vegard Tuseth1, Mohamed Salem, Reidar Pettersen, Ketil Grong, Svein Rotevatn, Tore Wentzel-Larsen, Jan Erik Nordrehaug.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ischemic cardiac arrest represents a challenge for optimal emergency revascularization therapy. A percutaneous left ventricular assist device (LVAD) may be beneficial.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a percutaneous LVAD during cardiac arrest without chest compressions and to assess the effect of fluid loading.
DESIGN: Totally, 16 pigs randomized to either conventional or intensive fluid with LVAD support during ventricular fibrillation (VF).
SETTING: Acute experimental trial with pigs under general anesthesia.
SUBJECTS: Farm pigs of both sexes.
INTERVENTIONS: After randomization for fluid infusion, VF was induced by balloon occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending artery. LVAD and fluid were started after VF had been induced. MEASUREMENTS: Brain, kidney, myocardial tissue perfusion, and cardiac index were measured with the microsphere injection technique at baseline, 3, and 15 minutes. Additional hemodynamic monitoring continued until 30 minutes. MAIN
RESULTS: At 15 minutes, vital organ perfusion was maintained without significant differences between the two groups. Mean cardiac index at 3 minutes of VF was 1.2 L x min(-1) x m2 (29% of baseline, p < 0.05). Mean perfusion at 3 minutes was 65% in the brain and 74% in the myocardium compared with baseline (p < 0.05), then remained unchanged during the initial 15 minutes. At 30 minutes, LVAD function was sustained in 11 of 16 animals (8 of 8 intensified fluid vs. 3 of 8 conventional fluid) and was associated with intensified fluid loading (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: During VF, a percutaneous LVAD may sustain vital organ perfusion. A potential clinical role of the device during cardiac arrest has yet to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19242324     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819c0642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  5 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Stéphane Cook; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Design and Development of a Miniaturized Percutaneously Deployable Wireless Left Ventricular Assist Device: Early Prototypes and Feasibility Testing.

Authors:  Brian Letzen; Jiheum Park; Zeynep Tuzun; Pramod Bonde
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Treatment of cardiogenic shock with left ventricular assist device combined with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a case report.

Authors:  Håvard Keilegavlen; Jan Erik Nordrehaug; Svein Faerestrand; Rune Fanebust; Reidar Pettersen; Rune Haaverstad; Vegard Tuseth
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Doubling survival and improving clinical outcomes using a left ventricular assist device instead of chest compressions for resuscitation after prolonged cardiac arrest: a large animal study.

Authors:  Matthias Derwall; Anne Brücken; Christian Bleilevens; Andreas Ebeling; Philipp Föhr; Rolf Rossaint; Karl B Kern; Christoph Nix; Michael Fries
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Cardiac Arrest in the Catheterization Laboratory.

Authors:  Kapil Yadav; Huu Tam Truong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.