Literature DB >> 19240124

A roadmap of clustering algorithms: finding a match for a biomedical application.

Bill Andreopoulos1, Aijun An, Xiaogang Wang, Michael Schroeder.   

Abstract

Clustering is ubiquitously applied in bioinformatics with hierarchical clustering and k-means partitioning being the most popular methods. Numerous improvements of these two clustering methods have been introduced, as well as completely different approaches such as grid-based, density-based and model-based clustering. For improved bioinformatics analysis of data, it is important to match clusterings to the requirements of a biomedical application. In this article, we present a set of desirable clustering features that are used as evaluation criteria for clustering algorithms. We review 40 different clustering algorithms of all approaches and datatypes. We compare algorithms on the basis of desirable clustering features, and outline algorithms' benefits and drawbacks as a basis for matching them to biomedical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19240124     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbn058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  48 in total

1.  Comparing the performance of biomedical clustering methods.

Authors:  Christian Wiwie; Jan Baumbach; Richard Röttger
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Dynamic Functional Connectivity States Reflecting Psychotic-like Experiences.

Authors:  Anita D Barber; Martin A Lindquist; Pamela DeRosse; Katherine H Karlsgodt
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-28

3.  Improved data visualization techniques for analyzing macromolecule structural changes.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Vidyashankara Iyer; Sangeeta B Joshi; David B Volkin; C Russell Middaugh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  CAMPAIGN: an open-source library of GPU-accelerated data clustering algorithms.

Authors:  Kai J Kohlhoff; Marc H Sosnick; William T Hsu; Vijay S Pande; Russ B Altman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  AutoSOME: a clustering method for identifying gene expression modules without prior knowledge of cluster number.

Authors:  Aaron M Newman; James B Cooper
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Big data in medical science--a biostatistical view.

Authors:  Harald Binder; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Guiding biomedical clustering with ClustEval.

Authors:  Christian Wiwie; Jan Baumbach; Richard Röttger
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 8.  Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks.

Authors:  Koyel Mitra; Anne-Ruxandra Carvunis; Sanath Kumar Ramesh; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  A highly efficient multi-core algorithm for clustering extremely large datasets.

Authors:  Johann M Kraus; Hans A Kestler
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  RRW: repeated random walks on genome-scale protein networks for local cluster discovery.

Authors:  Kathy Macropol; Tolga Can; Ambuj K Singh
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.