Literature DB >> 19239617

The effect of shade on the container index and pupal productivity of the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens breeding in artificial containers.

D Vezzani1, A P Albicócco.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess whether certain attributes of larval breeding sites are correlated with pupal productivity (i.e. numbers of pupae collected per sampling period), so that these could be used as the focus for control measures to enhance control efficiency. Therefore, the objectives were to identify the months of highest pupal productivity of Aedes aegypti (L.) and Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) in an urban temperate cemetery in Argentina where artificial containers of < 6 L (flower vases) were the predominant breeding habitats, to compare various measures of the productivity of sunlit and shaded containers and to determine whether the composition of the containers affected pupal productivity. Over a period of 9 months, 200 randomly chosen water-filled containers (100 sunlit and 100 shaded), out of approximately 3738 containers present (approximately 54% in shade), were examined each month within a cemetery (5 ha) in Buenos Aires (October 2006 to June 2007). In total, 3440 immatures of Cx pipiens and 1974 of Ae. aegypti were collected. The larvae : pupae ratio was 10 times greater for the former, indicating that larval mortality was greater for Cx pipiens. Both mosquito species showed a higher container index (CI) in shaded than in sunlit containers (Ae. aegypti: 12.8% vs. 6.9% [chi(2) = 17.6, P < 0.001]; Cx pipiens: 6.3% vs. 1.8% [chi(2) = 24, P < 0.001]). However, the number and the density of immatures per infested container and the number of pupae per pupa-positive container did not differ significantly between sunlit and shaded containers for either species. Therefore, the overall relative productivity of pupae per ha of Ae. aegypti and Cx pipiens was 2.3 and 1.8 times greater, respectively, in shaded than in sunlit areas as a result of the greater CIs of containers in shaded areas. Neither the CI nor the number of immatures per infested container differed significantly among container types of different materials in either lighting condition. The maximum CI and total pupal counts occurred in March for Ae. aegypti and in January and February for Cx pipiens. The estimated peak abundance of pupae in the whole cemetery reached a total of approximately 4388 in the middle of March for Ae. aegypti and approximately 1059 in the middle of January for Cx pipiens. Spearman's correlations between monthly total productivity and monthly CI were significant at P < 0.001 for Ae. aegypti (r(s) = 0.975) and P < 0.01 for Cx pipiens (r(s) = 0.869). Our findings indicate that the efficacy of control campaigns against the two most important mosquito vectors in temperate Argentina could be improved by targeting containers in shaded areas, with maximum effort during species-specific times of year when pupal productivity is at its peak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19239617     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00783.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Vet Entomol        ISSN: 0269-283X            Impact factor:   2.739


  26 in total

1.  PCR detection of Dirofilaria immitis in Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens from urban temperate Argentina.

Authors:  Darío Vezzani; María Mesplet; Diego F Eiras; María F Fontanarrosa; Leonhard Schnittger
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Distribution of the members of the Pipiens Assemblage in the sympatric area from Argentina: which is where and when?

Authors:  María V Cardo; Alejandra Rubio; Melania Junges; Darío Vezzani; Aníbal E Carbajo
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 3.  Temperature-dependent effects on the replication and transmission of arthropod-borne viruses in their insect hosts.

Authors:  Glady Hazitha Samuel; Zach N Adelman; Kevin M Myles
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.186

4.  Land use and land cover change and its impacts on dengue dynamics in China: A systematic review.

Authors:  Panjun Gao; Eva Pilot; Cassandra Rehbock; Marie Gontariuk; Simone Doreleijers; Li Wang; Thomas Krafft; Pim Martens; Qiyong Liu
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-10-20

5.  Assessment of combined tools and strategies for Aedes aegypti control with low environmental impact.

Authors:  Alejandra Rubio; María V Cardo; Aníbal E Carbajo; Darío Vezzani
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Vacant lots: productive sites for Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Mérida City, México.

Authors:  Carlos M Baak-Baak; Roger Arana-Guardia; Nohemi Cigarroa-Toledo; Maria Alba Loroño-Pino; Guadalupe Reyes-Solis; Carlos Machain-Williams; Barry J Beaty; Lars Eisen; Julián E García-Rejón
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Novel, meso-substituted cationic porphyrin molecule for photo-mediated larval control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Leonardo Lucantoni; Michela Magaraggia; Giulio Lupidi; Robert Kossivi Ouedraogo; Olimpia Coppellotti; Fulvio Esposito; Clara Fabris; Giulio Jori; Annette Habluetzel
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-12-20

8.  Cooler temperatures destabilize RNA interference and increase susceptibility of disease vector mosquitoes to viral infection.

Authors:  Zach N Adelman; Michelle A E Anderson; Michael R Wiley; Marta G Murreddu; Glady Hazitha Samuel; Elaine M Morazzani; Kevin M Myles
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-05-30

9.  Higher mosquito production in low-income neighborhoods of Baltimore and Washington, DC: understanding ecological drivers and mosquito-borne disease risk in temperate cities.

Authors:  Shannon L LaDeau; Paul T Leisnham; Dawn Biehler; Danielle Bodner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Household Wastes as Larval Habitats of Dengue Vectors: Comparison between Urban and Rural Areas of Kolkata, India.

Authors:  Soumyajit Banerjee; Gautam Aditya; Goutam K Saha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.