Literature DB >> 15066900

Effects of perceived treatment on quality of life and medical outcomes in a double-blind placebo surgery trial.

Cynthia McRae1, Eva Cherin, T Gayle Yamazaki, Gretchen Diem, Alexander H Vo, Dan Russell, J Heiner Ellgring, Stanley Fahn, Paul Greene, Sandra Dillon, Hal Winfield, Kimberly B Bjugstad, Curt R Freed.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: This study was part of a large double-blind sham surgery-controlled trial designed to determine the effectiveness of transplantation of human embryonic dopamine neurons into the brains of persons with advanced Parkinson's disease. This portion of the study investigated the quality of life (QOL) of participants during the 1 year of double-blind follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether QOL improved more in the transplant group than in the sham surgery group and to investigate outcomes at 1 year based on perceived treatment (the type of surgery patients thought they received).
DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the transplant or sham surgery. Reported results are from the 1-year double-blind period.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from across the United States and Canada. Assessment and surgery were conducted at 2 separate university medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: A volunteer sample of 40 persons with idiopathic Parkinson's disease participated in the transplant ("parent") study, and 30 agreed to participate in the related QOL study: 12 received the transplant and 18 received sham surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Interventions in the parent study were transplantation and sham brain surgery. Assessments of QOL were made at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of the actual transplant and sham surgery groups and the perceived treatment groups on QOL and medical outcomes. We also investigated change over time.
RESULTS: There were 2 differences or changes over time in the transplant and sham surgery groups. Based on perceived treatment, or treatment patients thought they received, there were numerous differences and changes over time. In all cases, those who thought they received the transplant reported better scores. Blind ratings by medical staff showed similar results.
CONCLUSIONS: The placebo effect was very strong in this study, demonstrating the value of placebo-controlled surgical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15066900     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.4.412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  60 in total

1.  Reevaluating the placebo effect in medical practice.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Wayne B Jonas; John Killen; Franklin G Miller; David Shurtleff
Journal:  Z Psychol       Date:  2014

2.  Placebo response to manual therapy: something out of nothing?

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

Review 3.  Placebo response: a consideration of its role in therapeutics.

Authors:  Richard L Kradin
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  The Soul in Medicine: Rabbinic and Scientific Controversies.

Authors:  Henri Zukier
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-12

Review 5.  Experimental designs and brain mapping approaches for studying the placebo analgesic effect.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Fabrizio Benedetti; Carlo Adolfo Porro
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Ethical issues in clinical neuroscience research: a patient's perspective.

Authors:  Perry D Cohen; Linda Herman; Sheryl Jedlinski; Peggy Willocks; Paula Wittekind
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Minority enrollment in Parkinson's disease clinical trials.

Authors:  Myra G Schneider; Christopher J Swearingen; Lisa M Shulman; Jian Ye; Mona Baumgarten; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.891

8.  Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in fibromyalgia: a phase I/II proof of concept trial.

Authors:  Gudrun Lange; Malvin N Janal; Allen Maniker; Jennifer Fitzgibbons; Malusha Fobler; Dane Cook; Benjamin H Natelson
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Bilateral subthalamic stimulation impairs cognitive-motor performance in Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Jay L Alberts; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage; Katie Hallahan; Megan Vitek; Rashi Bamzai; Jerrold L Vitek
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The impact of psychological factors on placebo responses in a randomized controlled trial comparing sham device to dummy pill.

Authors:  Suzanne M Bertisch; Anna R T Legedza; Russell S Phillips; Roger B Davis; William B Stason; Rose H Goldman; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.