Literature DB >> 19239060

Comparison of 192Ir air kerma calibration coefficients derived at ARPANSA using the interpolation method and at the National Physical Laboratory using a direct measurement.

D Butler1, A Haworth, T Sander, S Todd.   

Abstract

The reference air kerma rate from 192Ir High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy sources can be measured using a suitably calibrated Farmer chamber and an appropriate in-air calibration jig. When a primary standard for 192Ir gamma rays is available, a calibration coefficient for the chamber and jig combination can be determined directly. In Australia, due to the absence of such a standard, the chamber must be calibrated by interpolation of the response in 60Co and in a kilovoltage x-ray beam. Corrections for the effect of the jig, scatter and beam non-uniformity must then be measured or calculated before the reference air kerma rate can be determined. We compare the air-kerma calibration coefficient of a PTW 30010 PMMA/A1 Farmer chamber (referred to as Farmer chamber throughout this report) obtained from the 192Ir primary standard at the National Physical Laboratory in the UK with the corresponding coefficient obtained by interpolating Australian calibrations using 60Co and 250 kV x-rays and determining suitable correction factors. The resulting chamber/jig calibration coefficients differ by 0.2% which is well within the combined standard uncertainties of 1.2% and 0.6% reported by ARPANSA and NPL respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19239060     DOI: 10.1007/bf03178603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  3 in total

Review 1.  Air kerma and absorbed dose standards for reference dosimetry in brachytherapy.

Authors:  T Sander
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Ir-192 Calibration in Air with Farmer Chamber for HDR Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Liyun Chang; Sheng-Yow Ho; Tsair-Fwu Lee; Hueisch-Jy Ding; Pang-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.553

3.  Comparison of TLD calibration methods for 192Ir dosimetry.

Authors:  Annette Haworth; Duncan J Butler; Lisa Wilfert; Martin A Ebert; Stephen P Todd; Anna J M Hayton; Tomas Kron
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.