STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) histamine contents are altered in human narcolepsy and whether these alterations are specific to hypocretin deficiency, as defined by low CSF hypocretin-1. METHODS: Patients meeting the ICSD-2 criteria for narcolepsy with and without cataplexy and who had CSF hypocretin-1 results available were selected from the Stanford Narcolepsy Database on the basis of CSF availability and adequate age and sex matching across 3 groups: narcolepsy with low CSF hypocretin-1 (n=34, 100% with cataplexy), narcolepsy without low CSF hypocretin-1 (n=24, 75% with cataplexy), and normal controls (n=23). Low CSF hypocretin-1 was defined as CSF < or =110 pg/mL (1/3 of mean control values). Six of 34 patients with low CSF hypocretin-1, six of 24 subjects with normal CSF hypocretin-1, and all controls were unmedicated at the time of CSF collection. CSF histamine was measured in all samples using a fluorometric HPLC system. RESULTS: Mean CSF histamine levels were: 133.2 +/- 20.1 pg/mL in narcoleptic subjects with low CSF hypocretin-1, 233.3 +/- 46.5 pg/mL in patients with normal CSF hypocretin-1 (204.9 +/- 89.7 pg/mL if only patients without cataplexy are included), and 300.5 +/- 49.7 pg/mL in controls, reaching statistically significant differences between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: CSF histamine levels are reduced in human narcolepsy. The reduction of CSF histamine levels was more evident in the cases with low CSF hypocretin-1, and levels were intermediate in other narcolepsy cases. As histamine is a wake-promoting amine known to decrease during sleep, decreased histamine could either passively reflect or partially mediate daytime sleepiness in these pathologies.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) histamine contents are altered in humannarcolepsy and whether these alterations are specific to hypocretin deficiency, as defined by low CSF hypocretin-1. METHODS:Patients meeting the ICSD-2 criteria for narcolepsy with and without cataplexy and who had CSF hypocretin-1 results available were selected from the Stanford Narcolepsy Database on the basis of CSF availability and adequate age and sex matching across 3 groups: narcolepsy with low CSF hypocretin-1 (n=34, 100% with cataplexy), narcolepsy without low CSF hypocretin-1 (n=24, 75% with cataplexy), and normal controls (n=23). Low CSF hypocretin-1 was defined as CSF < or =110 pg/mL (1/3 of mean control values). Six of 34 patients with low CSF hypocretin-1, six of 24 subjects with normal CSF hypocretin-1, and all controls were unmedicated at the time of CSF collection. CSF histamine was measured in all samples using a fluorometric HPLC system. RESULTS: Mean CSF histamine levels were: 133.2 +/- 20.1 pg/mL in narcoleptic subjects with low CSF hypocretin-1, 233.3 +/- 46.5 pg/mL in patients with normal CSF hypocretin-1 (204.9 +/- 89.7 pg/mL if only patients without cataplexy are included), and 300.5 +/- 49.7 pg/mL in controls, reaching statistically significant differences between the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: CSF histamine levels are reduced in humannarcolepsy. The reduction of CSF histamine levels was more evident in the cases with low CSF hypocretin-1, and levels were intermediate in other narcolepsy cases. As histamine is a wake-promoting amine known to decrease during sleep, decreased histamine could either passively reflect or partially mediate daytime sleepiness in these pathologies.
Authors: S Nishino; B Ripley; S Overeem; S Nevsimalova; G J Lammers; J Vankova; M Okun; W Rogers; S Brooks; E Mignot Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: J Hara; C T Beuckmann; T Nambu; J T Willie; R M Chemelli; C M Sinton; F Sugiyama; K Yagami; K Goto; M Yanagisawa; T Sakurai Journal: Neuron Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Dmitry Gerashchenko; Thomas C Chou; Carlos A Blanco-Centurion; Clifford B Saper; Priyattam J Shiromani Journal: Sleep Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: R M Chemelli; J T Willie; C M Sinton; J K Elmquist; T Scammell; C Lee; J A Richardson; S C Williams; Y Xiong; Y Kisanuki; T E Fitch; M Nakazato; R E Hammer; C B Saper; M Yanagisawa Journal: Cell Date: 1999-08-20 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Ritchie E Brown; Radhika Basheer; James T McKenna; Robert E Strecker; Robert W McCarley Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 37.312