Literature DB >> 11805667

Validity of the active straight leg raise test for measuring disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy.

Jan M A Mens1, Andry Vleeming, Chris J Snijders, Bart W Koes, Henk J Stam.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis was performed with a group of women meeting strict criteria for posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. The active straight leg raise test and common severity measurement scales of lumbopelvic pain were scored.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the active straight leg raise test as a disease severity scale for patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Various diagnostic tools are used to measure disease severity in patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy, but simple tests with high reliability and validity still are needed.
METHODS: The investigation was performed with 200 women who had posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy. The validity of the active straight leg raise test as a severity scale was investigated by comparing the test score with the medical history, scores on self-reported disability scales, pain and tiredness, and pain provocation tests. The usefulness of the active straight leg raise test as a severity scale was compared with that of the Québec Back Pain Disability Scale. The influence of several demographic and anthropometric variables on the active straight leg raise score was investigated.
RESULTS: The active straight leg raise score ranged from 0 to 10 and correlated as expected with all severity scales. The correlation between the scores on the active straight leg raise test and the Québec Back Pain Disability Scale was 0.70. No association was found between the active straight leg raise score and age, parity, duration of the postpartum period, height, or weight.
CONCLUSION: The active straight leg raise test can be recommended as a disease severity scale for patients with posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805667     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  25 in total

Review 1.  The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; A T Masi; J E Carreiro; L Danneels; F H Willard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Inter-tester Reliability in Classifying Acute and Subacute Low Back Pain Patients into Clinical Subgroups: A Comparison of Specialists and Non-Specialists. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Markku Paatelma; Eira Karvqnen; Ari Heinqnen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

3.  Association between history and physical examination factors and change in lumbar multifidus muscle thickness after spinal manipulation in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Shane L Koppenhaver; Julie M Fritz; Jeffrey J Hebert; Greg N Kawchuk; Eric C Parent; Norman W Gill; John D Childs; Deydre S Teyhen
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Nina K Vøllestad; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence.

Authors:  W H Wu; O G Meijer; K Uegaki; J M A Mens; J H van Dieën; P I J M Wuisman; H C Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Metabolic disturbances identified by SPECT-CT in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint incompetence.

Authors:  Mel Cusi; Jennifer Saunders; Hans Van der Wall; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Pelvic girdle pain--associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hilde Stendal Robinson; Marit B Veierød; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Chronic sacroiliac joint and pelvic girdle dysfunction in a 35-year-old nulliparous woman successfully managed with multimodal and multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Holly Jonely; Jean-Michel Brismée; Mehul J Desai; Rachel Reoli
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-02

9.  Conservative management of groin pain during pregnancy: a descriptive case study.

Authors:  Deborah Ducar; Clayton D Skaggs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2005

Review 10.  European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Hanne B Albert; Hans Christian Ostgaard; Bengt Sturesson; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.