Literature DB >> 19237533

In vivo genotoxicity assessment of aluminium oxide nanomaterials in rat peripheral blood cells using the comet assay and micronucleus test.

A Balasubramanyam1, N Sailaja, M Mahboob, M F Rahman, Saber M Hussain, Paramjit Grover.   

Abstract

Advances in nanotechnology and its usage in various fields have led to the exposure of humans to engineered nanomaterials (NMs) and there is a need to tackle the potential human health effects before these materials are fully exploited. The main purpose of the current study was to assess whether aluminium oxide NMs (Al(2)O(3)-30 nm and Al(2)O(3)-40 nm) could cause potential genotoxic effects in vivo. Characterization of Al(2)O(3)-30 nm and Al(2)O(3)-40 nm was done with transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering and laser Doppler velocimetry prior to their use in this study. The genotoxicity end points considered in this study were the frequency of micronuclei (MN) and the percentage of tail DNA (% Tail DNA) migration in rat peripheral blood cells using the micronucleus test (MNT) and the comet assay, respectively. Genotoxic effects were evaluated in groups of female Wistar rats (five per group) after single doses of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg body weight (bw) of Al(2)O(3)-30 nm, Al(2)O(3)-40 nm and Al(2)O(3)-bulk. Al(2)O(3)-30 nm and Al(2)O(3)-40 nm showed a statistically significant dose-related increase in % Tail DNA for Al(2)O(3)-30 nm and Al(2)O(3)-40 nm (P < 0.05). However, Al(2)O(3)-bulk did not induce statistically significant changes over control values. The MNT also revealed a statistically significant (P < 0.05) dose-dependent increase in the frequency of MN, whereas Al(2)O(3)-bulk did not show any significant increase in frequency of MN compared to control. Cyclophosphamide (40 mg/kg bw) used as a positive control showed statistically significant (P < 0.001) increase in % Tail DNA and frequency of MN. The biodistribution of Al(2)O(3)-30 nm and Al(2)O(3)-40 nm and Al(2)O(3)-bulk in different rat tissues, urine and feces was also studied 14 days after treatment using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The data indicated that tissue distribution of Al(2)O(3) was size dependent. Our findings suggest that Al(2)O(3) NMs were able to cause size- and dose-dependent genotoxicity in vivo compared to Al(2)O(3)-bulk and control groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19237533     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gep003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  21 in total

1.  Prevention of oxidative DNA damage in inner organs and lymphocytes of rats by green tea extract.

Authors:  Nina Kager; Franziska Ferk; Michael Kundi; Karl-Heinz Wagner; Miroslav Misík; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Hepatotoxicity and Ultra Structural Changes in Wistar Rats treated with Al2O3 Nanomaterials.

Authors:  S Anitha Kumari; P Madhusudhanachary; Anita K Patlolla; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  Trends Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2016

3.  Short-term follow-up of disc cell therapy in a porcine nucleotomy model with an albumin-hyaluronan hydrogel: in vivo and in vitro results of metabolic disc cell activity and implant distribution.

Authors:  G W Omlor; J Fischer; K Kleinschmitt; K Benz; J Holschbach; K Brohm; M Anton; T Guehring; W Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  P Schulte; V Leso; M Niang; I Iavicoli
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Effects of Aqueous Leaf Extract of Lawsonia inermis on Aluminum-induced Oxidative Stress and Adult Wistar Rat Pituitary Gland Histology.

Authors:  Toluwase Solomon Olawuyi; Kolade Busuyi Akinola; Sunday Aderemi Adelakun; Babatunde Samson Ogunlade; Grace Temitope Akingbade
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-04-30

6.  Involvement of Mitophagy in Primary Cultured Rat Neurons Treated with Nanoalumina.

Authors:  Lan Zhang; Jinjin Zhao; Xinyue Guo; Cuicui Ge; Lijun Chang; Xiaocheng Gao; Tao Huang; Yanhong Wang; Nan Shang; Qiao Niu; Qinli Zhang
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.978

Review 7.  Progress and Recent Trends in the Application of Nanoparticles as Low Carbon Fuel Additives-A State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Jeffrey Dankwa Ampah; Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf; Ephraim Bonah Agyekum; Sandylove Afrane; Chao Jin; Haifeng Liu; Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah; Pau Loke Show; Mokhtar Shouran; Monier Habil; Salah Kamel
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 8.  Plant-Derived Natural Products in Cancer Research: Extraction, Mechanism of Action, and Drug Formulation.

Authors:  Wamidh H Talib; Izzeddin Alsalahat; Safa Daoud; Reem Fawaz Abutayeh; Asma Ismail Mahmod
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Genotoxic effects of chromium oxide nanoparticles and microparticles in Wistar rats after 28 days of repeated oral exposure.

Authors:  Shailendra Pratap Singh; Srinivas Chinde; Sarika Srinivas Kalyan Kamal; M F Rahman; M Mahboob; Paramjit Grover
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Appropriate in vitro methods for genotoxicity testing of silver nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ha Ryong Kim; Yong Joo Park; Da Young Shin; Seung Min Oh; Kyu Hyuck Chung
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.