Literature DB >> 15094535

Facet joint kinematics and injury mechanisms during simulated whiplash.

Adam M Pearson1, Paul C Ivancic, Shigeki Ito, Manohar M Panjabi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Facet joint kinematics and capsular ligament strains were evaluated during simulated whiplash of whole cervical spine specimens with muscle force replication.
OBJECTIVES: To describe facet joint kinematics, including facet joint compression and facet joint sliding, and quantify peak capsular ligament strain during simulated whiplash. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have implicated the facet joint as a source of chronic neck pain in whiplash patients. Prior in vivo and in vitro biomechanical studies have evaluated facet joint compression and excessive capsular ligament strain as potential injury mechanisms. No study has comprehensively evaluated facet joint compression, facet joint sliding, and capsular ligament strain at all cervical levels during multiple whiplash simulation accelerations.
METHODS: The whole cervical spine specimens with muscle force replication model and a bench-top trauma sled were used in an incremental trauma protocol to simulate whiplash of increasing severity. Peak facet joint compression (displacement of the upper facet surface towards the lower facet surface), facet joint sliding (displacement of the upper facet surface along the lower facet surface), and capsular ligament strains were calculated and compared to the physiologic limits determined during intact flexibility testing.
RESULTS: Peak facet joint compression was greatest at C4-C5, reaching a maximum of 2.6 mm during the 5 g simulation. Increases over physiologic limits (P < 0.05) were initially observed during the 3.5 g simulation. In general, peak facet joint sliding and capsular ligament strains were largest in the lower cervical spine and increased with impact acceleration. Capsular ligament strain reached a maximum of 39.9% at C6-C7 during the 8 g simulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Facet joint components may be at risk for injury due to facet joint compression during rear-impact accelerations of 3.5 g and above. Capsular ligaments are at risk for injury at higher accelerations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15094535     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000090836.50508.f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  46 in total

1.  Axial head rotation increases facet joint capsular ligament strains in automotive rear impact.

Authors:  Steven G Storvik; Brian D Stemper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Cervical neural space narrowing during simulated rear crashes with anti-whiplash systems.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spinal canal narrowing during simulated frontal impact.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Adam M Pearson; S Elena Gimenez; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Tensile stretching of cervical facet joint capsule and related axonal changes.

Authors:  Srinivasu Kallakuri; Anita Singh; Ying Lu; Chaoyang Chen; Ajit Patwardhan; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Whiplash causes increased laxity of cervical capsular ligament.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Shigeki Ito; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Wolfgang Rubin; Marcus P Coe; Anthony B Ndu; Erik J Carlson; Manohar M Panjabi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries.

Authors:  Gunter P Siegmund; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  An anatomical and immunohistochemical characterization of afferents innervating the C6-C7 facet joint after painful joint loading in the rat.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Kras; Kosuke Tanaka; Taylor M Gilliland; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Thrombospondin-4 and excitatory synaptogenesis promote spinal sensitization after painful mechanical joint injury.

Authors:  Nathan D Crosby; Frank Zaucke; Jeffrey V Kras; Ling Dong; Z David Luo; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Simulated whiplash modulates expression of the glutamatergic system in the spinal cord suggesting spinal plasticity is associated with painful dynamic cervical facet loading.

Authors:  Ling Dong; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Neck Muscle and Head/Neck Kinematic Responses While Bracing Against the Steering Wheel During Front and Rear Impacts.

Authors:  Jason B Fice; Daniel W H Mang; Jóna M Ólafsdóttir; Karin Brolin; Peter A Cripton; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Gunter P Siegmund
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.