OBJECTIVE: Elective ascending aortic replacement is recommended to prevent acute type A aortic dissection when any segment of the proximal aorta is greater than 5.5 cm. However, little data exist that meticulously describe the size of the ascending aorta at multiple levels in patients who suffer acute type A dissections. We sought to definitively characterize the size distribution of the proximal aorta in this patient population. METHODS: Preoperative transesophageal echocardiography was used to measure the diameter of the proximal aorta at the aortic annulus, in the sinus segment, at the sinotubular junction and in the ascending aorta in 177 non-Marfan patients with tricuspid aortic valves who presented to one institution over a 10-year period with an acute type A dissection. Predicted aortic diameters for each patient based on the individual's age, gender and body size were also calculated at all four aortic positions using previously published regression equations derived from a large cohort of normal patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients were female (33.9%; aged 67+/-12 years) and 117 were male (66.1%; aged 60+/-17 years). Sixty-two percent of all patients had maximum aortic diameters less than 5.5 cm at time of dissection and 42% of patients had maximum aortic diameters less than 5.0 cm. Over 20% of all patients had maximal aortic dimensions of less than 4.5 cm. In women, 12% of the dissected aortas had a maximal dimension less than 4.0 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with acute type A aortic dissection present with aortic diameters <5.5 cm and thus do not fall within current guidelines for elective ascending aortic replacement. Methods other than size measurement of the ascending aorta are needed to identify patients at risk for dissection. Aggressive medical management of patients with ascending aortic diameters over 4 cm is warranted. Preventative replacement of the ascending aorta at 4.5 cm should be considered especially at high volume aortic surgery centers and patients having cardiac surgery for other indications.
OBJECTIVE: Elective ascending aortic replacement is recommended to prevent acute type A aortic dissection when any segment of the proximal aorta is greater than 5.5 cm. However, little data exist that meticulously describe the size of the ascending aorta at multiple levels in patients who suffer acute type A dissections. We sought to definitively characterize the size distribution of the proximal aorta in this patient population. METHODS: Preoperative transesophageal echocardiography was used to measure the diameter of the proximal aorta at the aortic annulus, in the sinus segment, at the sinotubular junction and in the ascending aorta in 177 non-Marfan patients with tricuspid aortic valves who presented to one institution over a 10-year period with an acute type A dissection. Predicted aortic diameters for each patient based on the individual's age, gender and body size were also calculated at all four aortic positions using previously published regression equations derived from a large cohort of normal patients. RESULTS: Sixty patients were female (33.9%; aged 67+/-12 years) and 117 were male (66.1%; aged 60+/-17 years). Sixty-two percent of all patients had maximum aortic diameters less than 5.5 cm at time of dissection and 42% of patients had maximum aortic diameters less than 5.0 cm. Over 20% of all patients had maximal aortic dimensions of less than 4.5 cm. In women, 12% of the dissected aortas had a maximal dimension less than 4.0 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with acute type A aortic dissection present with aortic diameters <5.5 cm and thus do not fall within current guidelines for elective ascending aortic replacement. Methods other than size measurement of the ascending aorta are needed to identify patients at risk for dissection. Aggressive medical management of patients with ascending aortic diameters over 4 cm is warranted. Preventative replacement of the ascending aorta at 4.5 cm should be considered especially at high volume aortic surgery centers and patients having cardiac surgery for other indications.
Authors: Julie A Phillippi; Jennifer C Hill; Marie Billaud; Benjamin R Green; Mary P Kotlarczyk; Thomas G Gleason Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Derek P Nathan; Chun Xu; Ted Plappert; Benoit Desjardins; Joseph H Gorman; Joseph E Bavaria; Robert C Gorman; Krishnan B Chandran; Benjamin M Jackson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Leonid Emerel; James Thunes; Trevor Kickliter; Marie Billaud; Julie A Phillippi; David A Vorp; Spandan Maiti; Thomas G Gleason Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Brian Lima; Judson B Williams; S Dave Bhattacharya; Asad A Shah; Nicholas Andersen; Andrew Wang; J Kevin Harrison; G Chad Hughes Journal: J Heart Valve Dis Date: 2011-07
Authors: Kapil Krishnan; Liang Ge; Henrik Haraldsson; Michael D Hope; David A Saloner; Julius M Guccione; Elaine E Tseng Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2015-07-14