Literature DB >> 19236632

Getting ready for user involvement in a systematic review.

Elizabeth Smith1, Sheila Donovan, Peter Beresford, Jill Manthorpe, Sally Brearley, John Sitzia, Fiona Ross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to support the critical development of user involvement in systematic reviews by explaining some of the theoretical, ethical and practical issues entailed in 'getting ready' for user involvement.
BACKGROUND: Relatively few health or social care systematic reviews have actively involved service users. Evidence from other research contexts shows that user involvement can have benefits in terms of improved quality and outcomes, hence there is a need to test out different approaches in order to realize the benefits of user involvement and gain a greater understanding of any negative outcomes.
DESIGN: Setting up a service-user reference group for a review of user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research involved conceptualizing user involvement, developing a representation framework, identifying and targeting service users and creating a sense of mutuality and reciprocity. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Recruitment was undertaken across England by two researchers. Members from 24 national consumer organizations were selected to participate in the review. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Learning was gained about finding ways of navigating consumer networks and organizations, how best to communicate our goals and intentions and how to manage selection and 'rejection' in circumstances where we had stimulated enthusiasm. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Involving service users helped us to access information, locate the findings in issues that are important to service users and to disseminate findings. User involvement is about relationships in social contexts: decisions made at the early conceptual level of research design affect service users and researchers in complex and personal ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236632      PMCID: PMC5060487          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00535.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  12 in total

1.  Involving patients in research: setting up a service users' advisory group.

Authors:  P Rhodes; A Nocon; J Wright; S Harrison
Journal:  J Manag Med       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care.

Authors:  Mike J Crawford; Deborah Rutter; Catherine Manley; Timothy Weaver; Kamaldeep Bhui; Naomi Fulop; Peter Tyrer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-30

Review 3.  Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda.

Authors:  Jonathan Boote; Rosemary Telford; Cindy Cooper
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Making it happen: approaches to involving consumers in Cochrane reviews.

Authors:  Davina Ghersi
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 5.  Service user involvement in nursing, midwifery and health visiting research: a review of evidence and practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Smith; Fiona Ross; Sheila Donovan; Jill Manthorpe; Sally Brearley; John Sitzia; Peter Beresford
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Nicola Jones; Mary Newburn; Shanit Marshall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  E Murphy; R Dingwall; D Greatbatch; S Parker; P Watson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 8.  Lay perspectives: advantages for health research.

Authors:  V A Entwistle; M J Renfrew; S Yearley; J Forrester; T Lamont
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-07

9.  What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study.

Authors:  Rosemary Telford; Jonathan D Boote; Cindy L Cooper
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Influencing the national policy process: the role of health consumer groups.

Authors:  Kathryn Jones; Rob Baggott; Judith Allsop
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  16 in total

1.  Developing written information on osteoarthritis for patients: facilitating user involvement by exposure to qualitative research.

Authors:  Janet Grime; Brian Dudley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Julia Kreis; Milo A Puhan; Holger J Schünemann; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Involving service users in intervention design: a participatory approach to developing a text-messaging intervention to reduce repetition of self-harm.

Authors:  Christabel Owens; Paul Farrand; Ruth Darvill; Tobit Emmens; Elaine Hewis; Peter Aitken
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Interventions for adults with a history of complex traumatic events: the INCiTE mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Hollie Melton; Nick Meader; Holly Dale; Kath Wright; Julie Jones-Diette; Melanie Temple; Iram Shah; Karina Lovell; Dean McMillan; Rachel Churchill; Corrado Barbui; Simon Gilbody; Peter Coventry
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Tackling the tensions in evaluating capacity strengthening for health research in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Imelda Bates; Alan Boyd; Garry Aslanyan; Donald C Cole
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.344

6.  User involvement in a Cochrane systematic review: using structured methods to enhance the clinical relevance, usefulness and usability of a systematic review update.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Pauline Campbell; Gillian Baer; Pei Ling Choo; Jacqui Morris; Anne Forster
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 7.  Systematically searching for and assessing the literature for self-management of chronic pain: a lay users' perspective.

Authors:  Pat Schofield; Blair H Smith; Denis Martin; Derek Jones; Amanda Clarke; Paul McNamee; Ron Marsh; Michael Morrison; Rosemary Morrison; Sheena Fowler; Geraldine Anthony; Carrie Stewart
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  The role of the public in developing interventions: a reflection and critique of a cancer clinical trials unit's model.

Authors:  Jim Fitzgibbon; Jessica Baillie; Natalie Simon; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  User involvement in adolescents' mental healthcare: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Petter Viksveen; Stig Erlend Bjønness; Siv Hilde Berg; Nicole Elizabeth Cardenas; Julia Rose Game; Karina Aase; Marianne Storm
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure.

Authors:  Bridie Angela Evans; Emma Bedson; Philip Bell; Hayley Hutchings; Lesley Lowes; David Rea; Anne Seagrove; Stefan Siebert; Graham Smith; Helen Snooks; Marie Thomas; Kym Thorne; Ian Russell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.