Literature DB >> 19235374

In vivo verification of superficial dose for head and neck treatments using intensity-modulated techniques.

Zhen-Yu Qi1, Xiao-Wu Deng, Shao-Min Huang, Li Zhang, Zhi-Chun He, X Allen Li, Ian Kwan, Michael Lerch, Dean Cutajar, Peter Metcalfe, Anatoly Rosenfeld.   

Abstract

Skin dose is one of the key issues for clinical dosimetry in radiation therapy. Currently planning computer systems are unable to accurately predict dose in the buildup region, leaving ambiguity as to the dose levels actually received by the patient's skin during radiotherapy. This is one of the prime reasons why in vivo measurements are necessary to estimate the dose in the buildup region. A newly developed metal-oxide-semiconductor-field-effect-transistor (MOSFET) detector designed specifically for dose measurements in rapidly changing dose gradients was introduced for accurate in vivo skin dosimetry. The feasibility of this detector for skin dose measurements was verified in comparison with plane parallel ionization chamber and radiochromic films. The accuracy of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) in skin dose calculations for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was evaluated using MOSFET detectors in an anthropomorphic phantom as well as on the patients. Results show that this newly developed MOSFET detector can provide a minimal but highly reproducible intrinsic buildup of 7 mg cm(-2) corresponding to the requirements of personal surface dose equivalent Hp (0.07). The reproducibility of the MOSFET response, in high sensitivity mode, is found to be better than 2% at the phantom surface for the doses normally delivered to the patients. The MOSFET detector agrees well with the Attix chamber and the EBT Gafchromic film in terms of surface and buildup region dose measurements, even for oblique incident beams. While the dose difference between MOSFET measurements and TPS calculations is within measurement uncertainty for the depths equal to or greater than 0.5 cm, an overestimation of up to 8.5% was found for the surface dose calculations in the anthropomorphic phantom study. In vivo skin dose measurements reveal that the dose difference between the MOSFET results and the TPS calculations was on average -7.2%, ranging from -4.3% to -9.2%. The newly designed MOSFET detector encapsulated into a thin water protective film has a minimal reproducible intrinsic buildup recommended for skin dosimetry. This feature makes it very suitable for routine IMRT QA and accurate in vivo skin dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19235374     DOI: 10.1118/1.3030951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Superficial dosimetry imaging based on Čerenkov emission for external beam radiotherapy with megavoltage x-ray beam.

Authors:  Rongxiao Zhang; Adam K Glaser; David J Gladstone; Colleen J Fox; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Real-time eye lens dose monitoring during cerebral angiography procedures.

Authors:  M J Safari; J H D Wong; K A A Kadir; N K Thorpe; D L Cutajar; M Petasecca; M L F Lerch; A B Rosenfeld; K H Ng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Practical issues regarding angular and energy response in in vivo intraoperative electron radiotherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  Juan López-Tarjuelo; Ana Bouché-Babiloni; Virginia Morillo-Macías; Agustín Santos-Serra; Carlos Ferrer-Albiach
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-10-19

5.  In vivo real-time rectal wall dosimetry for prostate radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Hardcastle; Dean L Cutajar; Peter E Metcalfe; Michael L F Lerch; Vladimir L Perevertaylo; Wolfgang A Tomé; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Superficial dosimetry imaging of Čerenkov emission in electron beam radiotherapy of phantoms.

Authors:  Rongxiao Zhang; Colleen J Fox; Adam K Glaser; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Assessment of imaging Cherenkov and scintillation signals in head and neck radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel A Alexander; Irwin I Tendler; Petr Bruza; Xu Cao; Philip E Schaner; Bethany S Marshall; Lesley A Jarvis; David J Gladstone; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  On the Use of Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter for Surface Dose Measurement during Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fasihah Hanum Yusof; Ngie Min Ung; Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong; Wei Loong Jong; Vannyat Ath; Vincent Chee Ee Phua; Siew Ping Heng; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characteristics of mobile MOSFET dosimetry system for megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:  A Sathish Kumar; S D Sharma; B Paul Ravindran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-07

10.  Characterization of MOSkin detector for in vivo skin dose measurement during megavoltage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Wei Loong Jong; Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong; Ngie Min Ung; Kwan Hoong Ng; Gwo Fuang Ho; Dean L Cutajar; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.