Literature DB >> 19235229

Hippocampal-dependent spatial memory functions might be lateralized in rats: An approach combining gene expression profiling and reversible inactivation.

Sandra Klur1, Christophe Muller, Anne Pereira de Vasconcelos, Theresa Ballard, Joëlle Lopez, Rodrigue Galani, Ulrich Certa, Jean-Christophe Cassel.   

Abstract

The hippocampus is involved in spatial memory processes, as established in a variety of species such as birds and mammals including humans. In humans, some hippocampal-dependent memory functions may be lateralized, the right hippocampus being predominantly involved in spatial navigation. In rodents, the question of possible lateralization remains open. Therefore, we first microdissected the CA1 subregion of the left and right dorsal hippocampi for analysis of mRNA expression using microarrays in rats having learnt a reference memory task in the Morris water-maze. Relative to untrained controls, 623 genes were differentially expressed in the right hippocampus, against only 74 in the left hippocampus, in the rats that had learnt the hidden platform location. Thus, in the right hippocampus, 299 genes were induced, 324 were repressed, and about half of them participate in signaling and transport, metabolism, and nervous system functions. In addition, most differentially expressed genes associated with spatial learning have been previously related to synaptic plasticity and memory. We then subjected rats to unilateral (left or right) or bilateral reversible functional inactivations in the dorsal hippocampus; lidocaine was infused either before each acquisition session or before retrieval of a reference spatial memory in the Morris water maze. We found that after drug-free acquisition, right or bilateral lidocaine inactivation (vs. left, or bilateral phosphate buffered saline (PBS) infusions) of the dorsal hippocampus just before a delayed (24 h) probe trial impaired performance. Conversely, left or bilateral hippocampus inactivation (vs. right, or bilateral PBS infusions) before each acquisition session weakened performance during a delayed, drug-free probe trial. Our data confirm a functional association between transcriptional activity within the dorsal hippocampus and spatial memory in the rat. Further, they suggest that there could be a leftward bias of hippocampal functions in engram formation or information transfer, and a rightward bias in spatial memory storage/retrieval processes. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19235229     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  47 in total

Review 1.  How does PKMζ maintain long-term memory?

Authors:  Todd C Sacktor
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Playing Super Mario induces structural brain plasticity: gray matter changes resulting from training with a commercial video game.

Authors:  S Kühn; T Gleich; R C Lorenz; U Lindenberger; J Gallinat
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 15.992

3.  Effects of long-term electromagnetic field exposure on spatial learning and memory in rats.

Authors:  Dongmei Hao; Lei Yang; Su Chen; Jun Tong; Yonghao Tian; Benhang Su; Shuicai Wu; Yanjun Zeng
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Lateralization of observational fear learning at the cortical but not thalamic level in mice.

Authors:  Sangwoo Kim; Ferenc Mátyás; Sukchan Lee; László Acsády; Hee-Sup Shin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Hippocampal asymmetry: differences in structures and functions.

Authors:  Gonglin Hou; Xiangsi Yang; Ti-Fei Yuan
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  The ventral midline thalamus contributes to strategy shifting in a memory task requiring both prefrontal cortical and hippocampal functions.

Authors:  Thibault Cholvin; Michaël Loureiro; Raphaelle Cassel; Brigitte Cosquer; Karine Geiger; David De Sa Nogueira; Hélène Raingard; Laura Robelin; Christian Kelche; Anne Pereira de Vasconcelos; Jean-Christophe Cassel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rearing-environment-dependent hippocampal local field potential differences in wild-type and inositol trisphosphate receptor type 2 knockout mice.

Authors:  Mika Tanaka; Xiaowen Wang; Katsuhiko Mikoshiba; Hajime Hirase; Yoshiaki Shinohara
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Neurofunctional topography of the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Jennifer L Robinson; Daniel S Barron; Lauren A J Kirby; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Ashley C Hill; Jerry E Murphy; Jeffrey S Katz; Nouha Salibi; Simon B Eickhoff; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Intrahippocampal administration of a domain antibody that binds aggregated amyloid-β reverses cognitive deficits produced by diet-induced obesity.

Authors:  Danielle M Osborne; Dennis P Fitzgerald; Kelsey E O'Leary; Brian M Anderson; Christine C Lee; Peter M Tessier; Ewan C McNay
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-03-10

10.  Brain hemispheric differences in the neurochemical effects of lead, prenatal stress, and the combination and their amelioration by behavioral experience.

Authors:  Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Douglas Weston; Sue Liu; Joshua L Allen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.