Faruk Zorlu1, Ugur Selek, Hayyam Kiratli. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Oncology Hospital, Sihhiye, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively local tumor control and morbidity after fractionated CyberKnife radiosurgery for uveal melanoma unsuitable for ruthenium-106 brachytherapy or local resection. METHODS: This study includes melanoma > or =7 mm in initial height, or juxtapapillary and/or juxtamacular tumors (height > or =3 mm; posterior tumor margin extending to within 3 mm of optic disk rim and/or fovea). Patients were excluded if they presented evidence of echographic extrascleral tumor extension, neovascular glaucoma, or any form of pretreatment or metastases at baseline. The eye was stabilized by the same ophthalmologist via peribulbar injection of 5 cc 2% lidocaine. CyberKnife radiosurgery was performed delivering a total dose of 60 Gy to the 80% or 85% isodose line in three fractions. The planning target volume (PTV) included the contrast-enhancing lesion on MRI plus a 1-mm margin (no margin on fovea site). RESULTS: Five patients with uveal melanoma were treated by this procedure. All patients had serous retinal detachment associated with the tumor. No grade > or =2 acute toxicities were observed. Eight-month follow-up revealed a decrease in tumor thickness in three patients and reattachment of the retina in four. The tumors remained stable in two eyes and an increase in retinal detachment was noted in one eye. Vision improved minimally in two eyes and remained stable in three. CONCLUSION: CyberKnife fractionated radiosurgery seems to be a viable alternative local treatment modality in uveal melanoma with no serious acute side effects. Further follow-up is indicated.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively local tumor control and morbidity after fractionated CyberKnife radiosurgery for uveal melanoma unsuitable for ruthenium-106 brachytherapy or local resection. METHODS: This study includes melanoma > or =7 mm in initial height, or juxtapapillary and/or juxtamacular tumors (height > or =3 mm; posterior tumor margin extending to within 3 mm of optic disk rim and/or fovea). Patients were excluded if they presented evidence of echographic extrascleral tumor extension, neovascular glaucoma, or any form of pretreatment or metastases at baseline. The eye was stabilized by the same ophthalmologist via peribulbar injection of 5 cc 2% lidocaine. CyberKnife radiosurgery was performed delivering a total dose of 60 Gy to the 80% or 85% isodose line in three fractions. The planning target volume (PTV) included the contrast-enhancing lesion on MRI plus a 1-mm margin (no margin on fovea site). RESULTS: Five patients with uveal melanoma were treated by this procedure. All patients had serous retinal detachment associated with the tumor. No grade > or =2 acute toxicities were observed. Eight-month follow-up revealed a decrease in tumor thickness in three patients and reattachment of the retina in four. The tumors remained stable in two eyes and an increase in retinal detachment was noted in one eye. Vision improved minimally in two eyes and remained stable in three. CONCLUSION: CyberKnife fractionated radiosurgery seems to be a viable alternative local treatment modality in uveal melanoma with no serious acute side effects. Further follow-up is indicated.
Authors: Lee M Jampol; Claudia S Moy; Timothy G Murray; Sandra M Reynolds; Daniel M Albert; Andrew P Schachat; Kenneth R Diddie; Robert E Engstrom; Paul T Finger; Kenneth R Hovland; Leonard Joffe; Karl R Olsen; Craig G Wells Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Achilles J Fakiris; Simon S Lo; Mark A Henderson; Thomas C Witt; Robert M Worth; Ronald P Danis; Paul M Des Rosiers; Robert D Timmerman Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2007-01-12 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Laura Marucci; Anne M Lane; Wenjun Li; Kathleen M Egan; Evangelos S Gragoudas; Judy A Adams; John M Collier; John E Munzenrider Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-01-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Stefan Höcht; Roland Stark; Frank Seiler; Jens Heufelder; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Dino Cordini; Simone Marnitz; Heinz Kluge; Michael H Foerster; Wolfgang Hinkelbein Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: A Klingenstein; C Fürweger; A K Mühlhofer; S F Leicht; U C Schaller; A Muacevic; B Wowra; C Hintschich; K H Eibl Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 3.117