Literature DB >> 19234696

The implementation of SOMO (SOlution MOdeller) in the UltraScan analytical ultracentrifugation data analysis suite: enhanced capabilities allow the reliable hydrodynamic modeling of virtually any kind of biomacromolecule.

Emre Brookes1, Borries Demeler, Camillo Rosano, Mattia Rocco.   

Abstract

The interpretation of solution hydrodynamic data in terms of macromolecular structural parameters is not a straightforward task. Over the years, several approaches have been developed to cope with this problem, the most widely used being bead modeling in various flavors. We report here the implementation of the SOMO (SOlution MOdeller; Rai et al. in Structure 13:723-734, 2005) bead modeling suite within one of the most widely used analytical ultracentrifugation data analysis software packages, UltraScan (Demeler in Modern analytical ultracentrifugation: techniques and methods, Royal Society of Chemistry, UK, 2005). The US-SOMO version is now under complete graphical interface control, and has been freed from several constraints present in the original implementation. In the direct beads-per-atoms method, virtually any kind of residue as defined in the Protein Data Bank (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, prosthetic groups, detergents, etc.) can be now represented with beads whose number, size and position are all defined in user-editable tables. For large structures, a cubic grid method based on the original AtoB program (Byron in Biophys J 72:408-415, 1997) can be applied either directly on the atomic structure, or on a previously generated bead model. The hydrodynamic parameters are then computed in the rigid-body approximation. An extensive set of tests was conducted to further validate the method, and the results are presented here. Owing to its accuracy, speed, and versatility, US-SOMO should allow to fully take advantage of the potential of solution hydrodynamics as a complement to higher resolution techniques in biomacromolecular modeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19234696      PMCID: PMC2872189          DOI: 10.1007/s00249-009-0418-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  21 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Hydrodynamic bead modeling of biological macromolecules.

Authors:  O Byron
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Hydration from hydrodynamics. General considerations and applications of bead modelling to globular proteins.

Authors:  J García de la Torre
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Novel computer program for fast exact calculation of accessible and molecular surface areas and average surface curvature.

Authors:  Oleg V Tsodikov; M Thomas Record; Yuri V Sergeev
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Biomolecular hydration: from water dynamics to hydrodynamics.

Authors:  Bertil Halle; Monika Davidovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Charlie E M Strauss; Carol A Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Studying antibody conformations by ultracentrifugation and hydrodynamic modeling.

Authors:  Stephen E Harding; Emma Longman; Beatriz Carrasco; Alvaro Ortega; Jose Garcia de la Torre
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2004

8.  Integrin conformational regulation: uncoupling extension/tail separation from changes in the head region by a multiresolution approach.

Authors:  Mattia Rocco; Camillo Rosano; John W Weisel; David A Horita; Roy R Hantgan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 9.  Hydration of proteins and polypeptides.

Authors:  I D Kuntz; W Kauzmann
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1974

10.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.

Authors:  B Lee; F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1971-02-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  48 in total

1.  Characterization of conformational changes and protein-protein interactions of rod photoreceptor phosphodiesterase (PDE6).

Authors:  Suzanne L Matte; Thomas M Laue; Rick H Cote
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Structural insights into the assembly and shape of Type III restriction-modification (R-M) EcoP15I complex by small-angle X-ray scattering.

Authors:  Yogesh K Gupta; Lin Yang; Siu-Hong Chan; James C Samuelson; Shuang-yong Xu; Aneel K Aggarwal
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Hydrodynamic multibead modeling: problems, pitfalls and solutions. 3. Comparison of new approaches for improved predictions of translational properties.

Authors:  Peter Zipper; Helmut Durchschlag
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Defining the metal specificity of a multifunctional biofilm adhesion protein.

Authors:  Catherine T Chaton; Andrew B Herr
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Computing translational diffusion and sedimentation coefficients: an evaluation of experimental data and programs.

Authors:  Mattia Rocco; Olwyn Byron
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  GRPY: An Accurate Bead Method for Calculation of Hydrodynamic Properties of Rigid Biomacromolecules.

Authors:  Pawel J Zuk; Bogdan Cichocki; Piotr Szymczak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  N-terminal residues of the Vibrio cholerae virulence regulatory protein ToxT involved in dimerization and modulation by fatty acids.

Authors:  Brandon M Childers; Xiaohang Cao; Gregor G Weber; Borries Demeler; P John Hart; Karl E Klose
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A parametrically constrained optimization method for fitting sedimentation velocity experiments.

Authors:  Gary Gorbet; Taylor Devlin; Blanca I Hernandez Uribe; Aysha K Demeler; Zachary L Lindsey; Suma Ganji; Sabrah Breton; Laura Weise-Cross; Eileen M Lafer; Emre H Brookes; Borries Demeler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in the N-Ethylmaleimide Sensitive Factor (NSF) and their potential role in SNARE complex disassembly.

Authors:  Arne Moeller; Chunxia Zhao; Michael G Fried; Elizabeth M Wilson-Kubalek; Bridget Carragher; Sidney W Whiteheart
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.867

10.  Dimerization of bacterial diaminopimelate epimerase is essential for catalysis.

Authors:  Lilian Hor; Renwick C J Dobson; Matthew T Downton; John Wagner; Craig A Hutton; Matthew A Perugini
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.