Literature DB >> 19234264

Optimal acquisition delay for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma.

Satoshi Goshima1, Masayuki Kanematsu, Hiroshi Kondo, Yoshimune Shiratori, Minoru Onozuka, Noriyuki Moriyama, Kyongtae T Bae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the optimal acquisition delay for imaging of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma with multiphasic dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with chronic hepatic disease underwent three-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver, which revealed 49 hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas. Abdominal aortic contrast arrival time was determined with test bolus imaging. Patients were assigned to one of the following four groups according to acquisition delay determined from abdominal aortic contrast arrival time to the middle of the k-space for the early, late hepatic arterial, and portal venous phases: 0, 12, and 49 seconds (group 1); 3, 15, and 52 seconds (group 2); 6, 18, and 55 seconds (group 3); and 9, 21, and 58 seconds (group 4). Each phase of imaging took 12 seconds. Contrast enhancement in the abdominal aorta, portal vein, hepatic parenchyma, and hepatocellular carcinoma was evaluated. Peritumoral sinusoidal enhancement (i.e., coronal enhancement) also was assessed.
RESULTS: Intense enhancement of hepatocellular carcinoma with little background parenchymal enhancement occurred at 9-12 seconds (p < 0.05) after arrival of contrast material in the abdominal aorta. Hepatocellular carcinoma-to-liver contrast began to decline at 15 seconds and decreased to less than zero at 49 seconds. The conspicuity of coronal enhancement was greater 21 seconds after contrast administration than in earlier phases.
CONCLUSION: With the injection protocol used in this study, optimal acquisition delay-determined from abdominal aortic contrast arrival time to the middle of the k-space acquisition-for imaging of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma was 9-12, 21 or more, and 49 seconds for the early, late hepatic arterial, and portal venous phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19234264     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Modern magnetic resonance imaging of the liver].

Authors:  D M Hedderich; K Weiss; D Maintz; T Persigehl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver in the era of gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Francesco Agnello; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Dario Picone; Federica Vernuccio; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Lydia Giannitrapani; Adele Taibbi; Antonino Agrusa; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Massimo Galia; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri; Giuseppe Brancatelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for focal hepatic lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  You-Wei Li; Zheng-Guang Chen; Ji-Chen Wang; Zong-Ming Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparison of the Timing of Hepatic Arterial Phase and Image Quality Using Test-Bolus and Bolus-Tracking Techniques in Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl-Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid-Enhanced Hepatic Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Yuji Iyama; Takeshi Nakaura; Koichi Yokoyama; Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Tomohiro Namimoto; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.