Literature DB >> 19233530

Genetics on stage: public engagement in health policy development on preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Susan M Cox1, Magdalena Kazubowski-Houston, Jeff Nisker.   

Abstract

Arts-based approaches to public engagement offer unique advantages over traditional methods of consultation. Here we describe and assess our use of theatre as a method of public engagement in the development of health policy on preimplantation genetic diagnosis, a controversial method for selecting the genetic characteristics of embryos created through in vitro fertilization. Funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and Health Canada supported 16 performances of the play Orchids in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montréal and post-performance discussion in English and French (with Hubert Doucet) in 2005. A total of 741 individuals attended. The methods used to assess audience engagement and elicit policy-relevant dialogue included in-theatre observation of audience responses, moderated post-performance large audience discussion and focus groups, audience feedback forms and researcher fieldnotes. Emphasizing process and context over emerging outcomes, we reflect on the distinctive contributions of theatre in stimulating public engagement and the need to utilize multiple methods to adequately assess these contributions. We suggest continued dialogue about the possible uses of theatre in health policy development and conclude that greater clarity is needed with regard to citizens' (as well as specific stakeholders, policy makers' and sponsors') desired outcomes if there is to be a suitably nuanced and reflexive basis for assessing the effectiveness of various strategies for public engagement.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19233530     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  Grafting orchids and ugly: theatre, disability and arts-based health research.

Authors:  Kirsty Johnston
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2010-12

2.  Why and when should we use public deliberation?

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  Theatre of social justice.

Authors:  Miriam Shuchman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study of the Canadian public's perspectives.

Authors:  Diego S Silva; Jennifer L Gibson; Ann Robertson; Cécile M Bensimon; Sachin Sahni; Laena Maunula; Maxwell J Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: participant survey findings and qualitative insights.

Authors:  P Lehoux; J Jimenez-Pernett; F A Miller; B Williams-Jones
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Women's perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Jeff Nisker; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Engaging ethnic minority communities through performance and arts: health education in Cambodian forest villages.

Authors:  James J Callery; Nou Sanann; Rupam Tripura; Thoek Buntau; Thomas J Peto; Pich Kunthea; Christopher Pell; Ung Soviet; Chea Nguon; Dysoley Lek; Phaik Yeong Cheah
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.473

8.  Always leave the audience wanting more:  An entertaining approach to stimulate engagement with health research among publics in coastal Kenya through 'Magnet Theatre'.

Authors:  Gladys Sanga; Irene Jao; Noni Mumba; Salim Mwalukore; Dorcas Kamuya; Alun Davies
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-01-11

9.  Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support.

Authors:  Laura Williamson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

10.  Frame Reflection Lab: a Playful Method for Frame Reflection on Synthetic Biology.

Authors:  Marjoleine G van der Meij; Anouk A L M Heltzel; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Frank Kupper
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 0.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.