Literature DB >> 19232620

Comprehensive comparison of eight statistical modelling methods used in quantitative structure-retention relationship studies for liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides generated by protease digestion of the Escherichia coli proteome.

Peng Zhou1, Feifei Tian, Fenglin Lv, Zhicai Shang.   

Abstract

In this study, we propose a new peptide characterization method that gives attention to both the amino acid composition and the residue local environment. Using this approach, structural characteristics of peptides derived from Escherichia coli proteome were parameterized and, based upon that, the performance profile of eight statistical modelling methods were validated rigorously and compared comprehensively by applying them to modelling relationship between the sequence structure and retention ability for 816 experimentally measured peptides and to predicting normalized retention times for 121,273 unmeasured peptides in liquid chromatography. Results show that the regression models constructed by nonlinear approaches are more robust and predictable but time-consuming than those by linear ones. In these modelling methods, Gaussian process and back-propagation neural network possess the best stability, unbiased ability and predictive power, thus they can be used to accurately model the peptide structure-retention relationships; multiple linear regression and partial least squares regression perform worse compared to nonlinear modelling techniques but they are computationally efficient, so they are promising candidates for solving the qualitative problems involved in massive data. In addition, by investigating the descriptor importance in different models we found that the amino acid composition presents a significantly linear correlation with the retention time of peptides, whereas the residue environment is mainly correlated nonlinearly with peptide retention. The polar Arg and strongly hydrophobic amino acids such as Leu, Ile, Phe, Trp and Val are the critical factors influencing peptide retention behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232620     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.01.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  7 in total

1.  Structure-based characterization of the binding of peptide to the human endophilin-1 Src homology 3 domain using position-dependent noncovalent potential analysis.

Authors:  Chunjiang Fu; Gang Wu; Fenglin Lv; Feifei Tian
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Characterization of PDZ domain-peptide interactions using an integrated protocol of QM/MM, PB/SA, and CFEA analyses.

Authors:  Feifei Tian; Yonggang Lv; Peng Zhou; Li Yang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Modeling protein-peptide recognition based on classical quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach: implication for proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Zhong Ni; Keping Chen; Haijun Liu; Liang Chen; Chaoqun Lian; Lirong Yan
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  Biomacromolecular quantitative structure-activity relationship (BioQSAR): a proof-of-concept study on the modeling, prediction and interpretation of protein-protein binding affinity.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Congcong Wang; Feifei Tian; Yanrong Ren; Chao Yang; Jian Huang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  The Effect of Column and Eluent Fluorination on the Retention and Separation of non-Fluorinated Amino Acids and Proteins by HPLC.

Authors:  Katherine Joyner; Weizhen Wang; Yihua Bruce Yu
Journal:  J Fluor Chem       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.050

Review 6.  Computer-aided design of amino acid-based therapeutics: a review.

Authors:  Tayebeh Farhadi; Seyed MohammadReza Hashemian
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Systematic Modeling, Prediction, and Comparison of Domain-Peptide Affinities: Does it Work Effectively With the Peptide QSAR Methodology?

Authors:  Qian Liu; Jing Lin; Li Wen; Shaozhou Wang; Peng Zhou; Li Mei; Shuyong Shang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.