BACKGROUND: Single-frequency bioelectrical impedance has been used in clinical and research settings to measure extracellular fluid in arms. Its ease of use and low risk of user error suggests this measurement method may have advantages for use in nonlaboratory (community-based) environments when compared to other measurement methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using single-frequency bioelectrical impedance to detect upper limb lymphedema in nonlaboratory settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a standardized protocol, impedance ratios among healthy normal women, breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, and breast cancer survivors without lymphedema were compared with participants seated in an upright position conducive for use outside laboratory settings (community-based environments). Ratios of healthy normal controls and breast cancer survivor groups without lymphedema were very similar, with almost complete overlap in confidence intervals. However, those values were markedly different from the values assessed in the survivor group with lymphedema (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest impedance ratios determined by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance can be used as markers for lymphedema in nonlaboratory settings when a standardized protocol is used.
BACKGROUND: Single-frequency bioelectrical impedance has been used in clinical and research settings to measure extracellular fluid in arms. Its ease of use and low risk of user error suggests this measurement method may have advantages for use in nonlaboratory (community-based) environments when compared to other measurement methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using single-frequency bioelectrical impedance to detect upper limb lymphedema in nonlaboratory settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a standardized protocol, impedance ratios among healthy normal women, breast cancer survivors with lymphedema, and breast cancer survivors without lymphedema were compared with participants seated in an upright position conducive for use outside laboratory settings (community-based environments). Ratios of healthy normal controls and breast cancer survivor groups without lymphedema were very similar, with almost complete overlap in confidence intervals. However, those values were markedly different from the values assessed in the survivor group with lymphedema (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest impedance ratios determined by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance can be used as markers for lymphedema in nonlaboratory settings when a standardized protocol is used.
Authors: Rachelle Crescenzi; Paula M C Donahue; Sandra Weakley; Maria Garza; Manus J Donahue; Karen L Herbst Journal: Lymphat Res Biol Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 2.589
Authors: Sheila H Ridner; Candace M Bonner; Jennifer K Doersam; Bethany A Rhoten; Benjamin Schultze; Mary S Dietrich Journal: Lymphat Res Biol Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 2.589
Authors: Simona F Shaitelman; Kate D Cromwell; John C Rasmussen; Nicole L Stout; Jane M Armer; Bonnie B Lasinski; Janice N Cormier Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Melissa N Skolny; Cynthia L Miller; Krista Elliott; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2013-06-16 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Hoda E Sayegh; Maria S Asdourian; Meyha N Swaroop; Cheryl L Brunelle; Melissa N Skolny; Laura Salama; Alphonse G Taghian Journal: Curr Breast Cancer Rep Date: 2017-05-03
Authors: Maria Laura Avila; Leigh C Ward; Brian M Feldman; Madeline I Montoya; Jennifer Stinson; Alex Kiss; Leonardo R Brandão Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 3.240