Literature DB >> 19230044

Detachment of esophageal carcinoma cells from extracellular matrix causes relocalization of death receptor 5 and apoptosis.

Guang-Chao Liu1, Jun Zhang, Shi-Gui Liu, Rong Gao, Zhang-Fu Long, Ke Tao, Yuan-Fang Ma.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the effect of detachment of esophageal cancer cells from extracellular matrix on the localization of death receptor 5 (DR5) and apoptosis.
METHODS: Anchorage-dependent EC9706 cells of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were pretreated or not treated with brefeldin A. Detached cells were harvested by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid digestion. Expression and localization of DR5 in these cells were determined by immunocytochemical and immunofluorescence assays, as well as flow cytometry analysis. Apoptosis of EC9706 cells was detected by flow cytometry after stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled annexin V/propidium iodide. Activation of caspase 8 was detected by Western blot analysis.
RESULTS: Immunocytochemical assay indicated that DR5 was predominantly perinuclear in adherent cells but was mainly localized in cell membrane in detached cells. In addition, immunofluorescence assay also confirmed the above-mentioned results, and further demonstrated that DR5 was present in the form of coarse granules in detached cells, but in the form of fine granules in adherent cells. Cytometry analysis revealed higher levels of DR5 expression on the surfaces of brefeldin-A-untreated cells than on the surfaces of brefeldin-A-treated cells, but brefeldin A treatment did not affect the total DR5 expression levels. Moreover, nocodazole did not influence the extracelluar DR5 expression levels in EC9706 cells. Apoptosis assay revealed that detached cells were more sensitive to DR5 antibody-induced apoptosis than adherent cells. Western blotting showed that caspase 8 was activated in temporarily detached cells 4 h earlier than in adherent cells.
CONCLUSION: Progress from adhesion to detachment of EC9706 cells causes DR5 relocalization, and promotes cytoplasmic translocation of DR5 to cell surfaces via a Golgi-dependent pathway. Moreover, it might also result in DR5 aggregation to render apoptosis of detached cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19230044      PMCID: PMC2653383          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  20 in total

1.  Temperature-sensitive differential affinity of TRAIL for its receptors. DR5 is the highest affinity receptor.

Authors:  A Truneh; S Sharma; C Silverman; S Khandekar; M P Reddy; K C Deen; M M McLaughlin; S M Srinivasula; G P Livi; L A Marshall; E S Alnemri; W V Williams; M L Doyle
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Increased death receptor 5 expression by chemotherapeutic agents in human gliomas causes synergistic cytotoxicity with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M Nagane; G Pan; J J Weddle; V M Dixit; W K Cavenee; H J Huang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Bile acid regulation of hepatic physiology: IV. Bile acids and death receptors.

Authors:  Hajime Higuchi; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.052

4.  Bile salts mediate hepatocyte apoptosis by increasing cell surface trafficking of Fas.

Authors:  T Sodeman; S F Bronk; P J Roberts; H Miyoshi; G J Gores
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis.

Authors:  S R Wiley; K Schooley; P J Smolak; W S Din; C P Huang; J K Nicholl; G R Sutherland; T D Smith; C Rauch; C A Smith
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  Expression of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its receptors in gastric carcinoma and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes: a possible mechanism of immune evasion of the tumor.

Authors:  Shohei Koyama; Naoto Koike; Shinya Adachi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-12-12       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Prognostic significance of Fas (CD95) and TRAIL receptors (DR4/DR5) expression in acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Young Joo Min; Je-Hwan Lee; Seong-Jun Choi; Hyun-Sook Chi; Jung-Shin Lee; Woo-Kun Kim; Kyoo-Hyung Lee
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.156

8.  Interaction of microtubules with peroxisomes. Tubular and spherical peroxisomes in HepG2 cells and their alterations induced by microtubule-active drugs.

Authors:  M Schrader; J K Burkhardt; E Baumgart; G Lüers; H Spring; A Völkl; H D Fahimi
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  DR5 receptor mediates anoikis in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Luciana M Laguinge; Raed N Samara; Wenge Wang; Wafik S El-Deiry; Georgia Corner; Leonard Augenlicht; Lopa Mishra; J Milburn Jessup
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Apo2L/TRAIL and its death and decoy receptors.

Authors:  H N LeBlanc; A Ashkenazi
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 15.828

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Intracellular localization of DR5 and related regulatory pathways as a mechanism of resistance to TRAIL in cancer.

Authors:  Ufuk Mert; Ahter Dilsad Sanlioglu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  TRAIL and vitamins: opting for keys to castle of cancer proteome instead of open sesame.

Authors:  Ammad Ahmad Farooqi; Shahzad Bhatti; Muhammad Ismail
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.722

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.