INTRODUCTION: Crohn's disease (CD) may lead to protein and calorie malnutrition (PCM) secondary to impaired digestive and absorptive functions of the small intestine and sometimes to the influence of diet taboos. The earlier the PCM is diagnosed, the higher are the odds of reversal. The objective of this study was to compare different methods of nutritional assessment in patients with CD and correlate them with the disease characteristics. SAMPLE: The sample comprised 75 patients with CD from the Gastroenterology Service at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre; 37 were male, with a mean age of 38.2 years old (SD = 13.3). All patients had been in clinical remission (CDAI <150) for over 3 months. They were not receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition. The nutritional assessment was considered: body mass index (BMI), triceps skin fold (TSF), arm circumference (MAC), arm muscle circumference (MAMC), subjective global assessment (SGA), non-dominating handgrip strength (HGS) and food intake inquiries. RESULTS: When comparing the different nutritional assessment methods, 26.7% of the patients were malnourished according to the MAC, 29.3% according to the MAMC, 18.7% according to the SGA, 6.7% according to the BMI, 37.3% according to the TSF and 73.3% according to the HGS. No statistically significant associations were found for disease location, its behavior, drugs utilized, ESR, CRP, age of patients and disease time with the nutritional state verified by HGS, TSF, MAMC and SGA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of malnutrition is significant in patients with CD, even in clinical remission. The BMI should not be used as reference in this population. The HGS detected a high prevalence of nutritional risk in patients with CD in remission. Studies are required that correlate it with more sensitive methods, for the patients' effective nutritional state assessment.
INTRODUCTION:Crohn's disease (CD) may lead to protein and calorie malnutrition (PCM) secondary to impaired digestive and absorptive functions of the small intestine and sometimes to the influence of diet taboos. The earlier the PCM is diagnosed, the higher are the odds of reversal. The objective of this study was to compare different methods of nutritional assessment in patients with CD and correlate them with the disease characteristics. SAMPLE: The sample comprised 75 patients with CD from the Gastroenterology Service at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre; 37 were male, with a mean age of 38.2 years old (SD = 13.3). All patients had been in clinical remission (CDAI <150) for over 3 months. They were not receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition. The nutritional assessment was considered: body mass index (BMI), triceps skin fold (TSF), arm circumference (MAC), arm muscle circumference (MAMC), subjective global assessment (SGA), non-dominating handgrip strength (HGS) and food intake inquiries. RESULTS: When comparing the different nutritional assessment methods, 26.7% of the patients were malnourished according to the MAC, 29.3% according to the MAMC, 18.7% according to the SGA, 6.7% according to the BMI, 37.3% according to the TSF and 73.3% according to the HGS. No statistically significant associations were found for disease location, its behavior, drugs utilized, ESR, CRP, age of patients and disease time with the nutritional state verified by HGS, TSF, MAMC and SGA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of malnutrition is significant in patients with CD, even in clinical remission. The BMI should not be used as reference in this population. The HGS detected a high prevalence of nutritional risk in patients with CD in remission. Studies are required that correlate it with more sensitive methods, for the patients' effective nutritional state assessment.
Authors: Mark S Silverberg; Jack Satsangi; Tariq Ahmad; Ian D R Arnott; Charles N Bernstein; Steven R Brant; Renzo Caprilli; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Christoph Gasche; Karel Geboes; Derek P Jewell; Amir Karban; Edward V Loftus; A Salvador Peña; Robert H Riddell; David B Sachar; Stefan Schreiber; A Hillary Steinhart; Stephan R Targan; Severine Vermeire; B F Warren Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: D M Russell; P M Walker; L A Leiter; A A Sima; W K Tanner; D A Mickle; J Whitwell; E B Marliss; K N Jeejeebhoy Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1984-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Kristina Norman; Tatjana Schütz; Martin Kemps; Heinrich Josef Lübke; Herbert Lochs; Matthias Pirlich Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Márcia Soares-Mota; Tianny A Silva; Luanda M Gomes; Marco A S Pinto; Laura M C Mendonça; Maria Lúcia F Farias; Tiago Nunes; Andrea Ramalho; Cyrla Zaltman Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Valérie Marcil; Emile Levy; Devendra Amre; Alain Bitton; Ana Maria Guilhon de Araújo Sant'Anna; Andrew Szilagy; Daniel Sinnett; Ernest G Seidman Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Nik Sheng Ding; Daniel Tassone; Ibrahim Al Bakir; Kyle Wu; Alexander J Thompson; William R Connell; George Malietzis; Phillip Lung; Siddharth Singh; Chang-Ho Ryan Choi; Simon Gabe; John T Jenkins; Ailsa Hart Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 10.020
Authors: Ryan W Stidham; Akbar K Waljee; Nicholas M Day; Carrie L Bergmans; Katelin M Zahn; Peter D R Higgins; Stewart C Wang; Grace L Su Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 5.325