Literature DB >> 19229576

The mfERG response topography with scaled stimuli: effect of the stretch factor.

Charlotte M Poloschek1, Michael Bach.   

Abstract

In multifocal electroretinogram recordings, the stimulus array is usually scaled with eccentricity to compensate for cone density changes. The strength of this scaling is parameterized by the so-called "stretch factor" (SF). In this study, we determined the quantitative influence of the SF striving for equal response densities over the entire stimulus area. VERIS 4.8 software was used to record multifocal ERGs from 11 normals with 61 hexagons and a 60 degrees stimulus diameter. Six recordings were obtained per subject with SFs 0, 12, 23, 25, 27, and 29. For analysis, we calculated the mean hexagon area per eccentricity and the average amplitude for elements of equal eccentricity (rings 1-5 = R1-R5), normalized to R2. As expected, recordings with SF = 0 showed the steepest amplitude drop-off with eccentricity (relative amplitudes of 1.90 (R1/R2), 1.0 (R2/R2), 0.67 (R3/R2), 0.51 (R4/R2), 0.38 (R5/R2). Using the preset SF = 12 in our set-up resulted in R1-amplitudes 1.7x larger than the peripheral amplitudes (relative amplitudes 1.39, 1.0, 0.88, 0.87, 0.82). SF = 23 compensated best for eccentricity, yielding relative amplitudes of 1.2, 1.0, 1.02, 1.08, and 1.11. Deviations increased again with higher SFs. To minimize amplitude variability over the stimulated retinal area, the optimal SF needs to be adjusted to the individual recording set-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19229576     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-009-9169-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Stray light-induced multifocal electroretinograms.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shimada; Masayuki Horiguchi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Scanning laser ophthalmoscope-evoked multifocal ERG (SLO-mfERG) in patients with macular holes and normal individuals.

Authors:  G Rudolph; P Kalpadakis; M Bechmann; C Haritoglou; A Kampik
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Multifocal electroretinograms combined with periodic flashes: direct responses and induced components.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Shimada; Marcus A Bearse; Erich E Sutter
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual field and multifocal electroretinography and their correlations in patients on hydroxychloroquine therapy.

Authors:  Timothy Y Y Lai; Jasmine W S Ngai; Wai-Man Chan; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Changes in implicit time of the multifocal electroretinogram response following contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chen; Brian Brown; Katrina L Schmid
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  The influence of luminance on the multifocal ERG.

Authors:  Thilo Schimitzek; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Retinal adaptation responses revealed by global flash multifocal electroretinogram are dependent on the degree of myopic refractive error.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chen; Brian Brown; Katrina L Schmid
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Using multifocal ERG ring ratios to detect and follow Plaquenil retinal toxicity: a review : Review of mfERG ring ratios in Plaquenil toxicity.

Authors:  Jonathan S Lyons; Matthew L Severns
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Retinal function in normal and diabetic eyes mapped with the slow flash multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  Marcus A Bearse; Ying Han; Marilyn E Schneck; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Identification of a subtype of cone photoreceptor, likely to be blue sensitive, in the human retina.

Authors:  P K Ahnelt; H Kolb; R Pflug
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1987-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Electrophysiological examination methods in glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  C M Poloschek; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Correlation between multifocal pattern electroretinography and Fourier-domain OCT in eyes with temporal hemianopia from chiasmal compression.

Authors:  Mário L R Monteiro; Kenzo Hokazono; Leonardo P Cunha; Maria K Oyamada
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Clinical display of mfERG data.

Authors:  Michael F Marmor; Lorella Cabael
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.