OBJECTIVE: To assess internal and external responsiveness of the Activity of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Survey and Numeric Pain Rating Scale on patients with patellofemoral pain. DESIGN: One group pre-post design. SUBJECTS: A total of 60 individuals with patellofemoral pain (33 women; mean age 29.9 (standard deviation 9.6) years). METHODS: The Activity of Daily Living Scale and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale were assessed before and after 8 weeks of physical therapy program. Patients completed a global rating of change scale at the end of therapy. The standardized effect size, Guyatt responsiveness index, and the minimum clinical important difference were calculated. RESULTS: Standardized effect size of the Activity of Daily Living Scale was 0.63, Guyatt responsiveness index was 1.4, area under the curve was 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.72, 0.94), and the minimum clinical important difference corresponded to an increase of 7.1 percentile points. Standardized effect size of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale was 0.72, Guyatt responsiveness index was 2.2, area under the curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.70, 0.92), and the minimum clinical important difference corresponded to a decrease of 1.16 points. CONCLUSION: Information from this study may be helpful to therapists when evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention on physical function and pain, and to power future clinical trials on patients with patellofemoral pain.
OBJECTIVE: To assess internal and external responsiveness of the Activity of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Survey and Numeric Pain Rating Scale on patients with patellofemoral pain. DESIGN: One group pre-post design. SUBJECTS: A total of 60 individuals with patellofemoral pain (33 women; mean age 29.9 (standard deviation 9.6) years). METHODS: The Activity of Daily Living Scale and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale were assessed before and after 8 weeks of physical therapy program. Patients completed a global rating of change scale at the end of therapy. The standardized effect size, Guyatt responsiveness index, and the minimum clinical important difference were calculated. RESULTS: Standardized effect size of the Activity of Daily Living Scale was 0.63, Guyatt responsiveness index was 1.4, area under the curve was 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.72, 0.94), and the minimum clinical important difference corresponded to an increase of 7.1 percentile points. Standardized effect size of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale was 0.72, Guyatt responsiveness index was 2.2, area under the curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.70, 0.92), and the minimum clinical important difference corresponded to a decrease of 1.16 points. CONCLUSION: Information from this study may be helpful to therapists when evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation intervention on physical function and pain, and to power future clinical trials on patients with patellofemoral pain.
Authors: Mark Stewart; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge; Nikolai Bogduk; Michael Nicholas Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M Morrow; Emily J Miller; Robert A Adams; John W Sperling; Kenton R Kaufman Journal: J Geriatr Phys Ther Date: 2018 Jul/Sep Impact factor: 3.381
Authors: Catherine J Fedorka; Antonia F Chen; William M McGarry; Javad Parvizi; Brian A Klatt Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Shawn Farrokhi; Sara R Piva; Alexandra B Gil; Chester V Oddis; Maria M Brooks; G Kelley Fitzgerald Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Jeffrey B Taylor; Hsin-Min Wang; Randy J Schmitz; Christopher K Rhea; Scott E Ross; Sandra J Shultz Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Natalie J Collins; Devyani Misra; David T Felson; Kay M Crossley; Ewa M Roos Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.794