| Literature DB >> 19228408 |
Manuela Madeddu1, Fiammetta Berlinguer, Massimo Ledda, Giovanni G Leoni, Valentina Satta, Sara Succu, Andrea Rotta, Valeria Pasciu, Angelo Zinellu, Marco Muzzeddu, Ciriaco Carru, Salvatore Naitana.
Abstract
This study aimed to test the feasibility of a programme of semen collection and cryopreservation in Griffon vultures. Four wild-caught individuals kept in captivity because of unrecoverable traumas were used. Semen collection attempts were made twice a week during three consecutive reproductive seasons (December - March) using the abdominal massage method. Ejaculation was successfully induced between late January and late February. Semen collection efficiency was rather low (27.9%) and it did not vary among individuals (p > 0.05). No differences were found in ejaculate volumes (12.5 +/- 9.1 microl), spermatozoa concentration (28.4 +/- 30.9 million cells/ml) and viability (61.3 +/- 13.9%) among the 4 vultures. ATP values differed among the four vultures (p < 0.001); B showed higher nucleotide concentration than both C and D, while it did not differ form A, whose values were higher compared with D. After freezing and thawing, semen in vitro viability, DNA integrity and ATP intracellular concentration were determined. Spermatozoa viability after thawing did not differ among the four individuals (52.6 +/- 5.8 in A, 53.4 +/- 4.6 in B, 50.4 +/- 3.2 in C, 42.5 +/- 2.7 in D), but it decreased significantly compared to fresh semen (p < 0.05). During 4 hrs in vitro culture, spermatozoa collected from B maintained over time a higher viability in vitro when compared to A, C and D. As evaluated by the comet assay method, DNA fragmentation after freezing and thawing did not differ in the 4 vultures. ATP concentration in frozen/thawed semen was significantly lower than in fresh semen (p < 0.0001). This study indicates that semen cryopreservation can be considered as a useful tool in the conservation of Griffon vulture genetic resources, but further studies are needed to optimize this technique.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19228408 PMCID: PMC2649137 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Figure 1Griffon vulture (.
Ejaculate volume, semen concentration and viability in four wild-caught Griffon vultures.
| Volume (μl) | Concentration (×106/ml) | Viability (%) | ||||
| Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | |
| A | 12.5 ± 6.3 | 6–20 | 32.9 ± 34 | 2–98.2 | 56.3 ± 12.4 | 42.9–75.9 |
| B | 13.4 ± 10.8 | 1–38 | 25.5 ± 21.6 | 3.8–76.7 | 63.8 ± 14.7 | 33.8–85.3 |
| C | 10.8 ± 7.3 | 3–20 | 38.6 ± 56.9 | 5–136.9 | 57.1 ± 14.7 | 41.1–70.2 |
| D | 11 ± 8.5 | 3–20 | 6.4 ± 5.7 | 2.4–10.5 | 61.2 ± 13.2 | 51.8–70.6 |
| TOTAL | 12.5 ± 9.1 | 1–38 | 28.4 ± 30.9 | 2–137.5 | 61.3 ± 13.9 | 33.8–85.2 |
Figure 2Plot of fitted model showing viability decreasing rates over 4 hrs in vitro culture in frozen/thawed spermatozoa obtained from 4 Griffon vultures. Comparison of regression lines: B ≠ A, C, D p < 0.001.
Differences in comet parameters in frozen/thawed spermatozoa collected from 4 Griffon vultures.
| Tail % DNA | Olive tail moment | Comet length (μm) | |
| A | 7 ± 8.5 | 19.9 ± 22.9 | 141.4 ± 46.9 |
| B | 16.3 ± 20.4 | 21.2 ± 26.9 | 166.9 ± 116.6 |
| C | 10.5 ± 12.8 | 20.9 ± 21.7 | 156.2 ± 83.4 |
| D | 9.7 ± 9.6 | 22.8 ± 23.7 | 155.8 ± 54.5 |
| TOTAL | 13 ± 17.1 | 21.3 ± 25.4 | 159.3 ± 94.8 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Figure 3Comet images of frozen/thawed Griffon vulture spermatozoa showing increasing levels of DNA damage.
Figure 4ATP concentration (nmolATP/10. In the same group: Anova: a ≠ b p < 0.001; in different groups: Anova d ≠ e, f; c ≠ f p < 0.001.