| Literature DB >> 19228385 |
Patrick Kirwan1, Samuel O Asaolu, Síle F Molloy, Titilayo C Abiona, Andrew L Jackson, Celia V Holland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children aged between one and five years are particularly vulnerable to disease caused by soil-transmitted helminths (STH). Periodic deworming has been shown to improve growth, micronutrient status (iron and vitamin A), and motor and language development in preschool children and justifies the inclusion of this age group in deworming programmes. Our objectives were to describe the prevalence and intensity of STH infection and to investigate the effectiveness of repeated four-monthly albendazole treatments on STH infection in children aged one to four years.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19228385 PMCID: PMC2649135 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Trial Profile.
Baseline patterns of STH and S. haematobium infections in children aged 1–4 years.
| Age (years) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Any helminth | |||||
| No. infected | 620 (50.5%) a | 167 (39.6%) | 161 (55.9%) | 172 (61.4%) | 120 (50.4%) |
| No. Infected | 585 (47.6%) | 161 (38.2%) | 157 (54.5%) | 159 (56.8%) | 108 (45.4%) |
| Mean epg ± SE | 1077 ± 78 | 504 ± 67 | 1386 ± 190 | 1636 ± 218 | 1059 ± 166 |
| No. Infected | 46 (3.7%) | 6 (1.4%) | 12 (4.2%) | 15 (5.4%) | 13 (5.5%) |
| Mean epg ± SE | 4 ± 2 | 1 ± 1 | 4 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 12 ± 11 |
| Hookworm | |||||
| No. Infected | 53 (4.3%) | 8 (1.9%) | 10 (3.5%) | 19 (6.8%) | 16 (6.7%) |
| Mean epg ± SE | 4 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 3 ± 2 | 7 ± 4 | 7 ± 3 |
| No. Infected | 14 (1.1%) | 3 (0.7%) | 1 (0.3%) | 6 (2.1%) | 4 (1.7%) |
| Mean epg ± SEb | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.02 |
a % prevalence
b The maximum number of eggs detected in an individual was 6
Baseline characteristics for individuals that were lost to follow-up and individuals that were analysed, and individuals in the treatment and placebo group
| Individuals lost to follow-up | Individuals analysed | P | Treatment Group | Placebo Group | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | ||||||
| 12–23 | 287 (34.2%) | 135 (34.8%) | 0.336* | 72 (37.1%) | 63 (32.5%) | 0.374* |
| 24–35 | 187 (22.3%) | 101 (26%) | 46 23.7%) | 55 (28.4%) | ||
| 36–47 | 194 (23.1%) | 86 (22.2%) | 39 (20.1%) | 47 (24.2%) | ||
| 48–59 | 172 (20.5%) | 66 (17%) | 37 (19.1%) | 29 (14.9%) | ||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 443 (52.7%) | 193 (49.7%) | 0.329* | 103 (53.1%) | 90 (46.4%) | 0.187* |
| Female | 397 (47.3%) | 195 (50.3%) | 91 (46.9%) | 104 (53.6%) | ||
| Village | ||||||
| Akinlalu | 99 (11.8%) | 86 (22.2%) | 0.588* | 43 (22.2%) | 43 (22.2%) | 0.562* |
| Ipetumodu | 378 (45%) | 157 (40.5%) | 80 (41.2%) | 77 (39.7%) | ||
| Moro | 160 (19%) | 59 (15.2%) | 33 (17%) | 26 (13.4%) | ||
| Edun-abon | 203 (24.2%) | 86 (22.2%) | 38 (19.6%) | 48 (24.7%) | ||
| Socio-economic status | ||||||
| Mean ± SE | 6.49 ± 0.10 | 6.28 ± 0.06 | 0.077┼ | 6.39 ± 0.13 | 6.59 ± 0.15 | 0.324┼ |
| 409 (48.7%) | 176 (45.4%) | 0.277* | 88 (45.4%) | 88 (45.4%) | 1* | |
| Mean epg ± SE | 1060.69 ± 91.70 | 1111 ± 149.53 | 0.581┼ | 1095.19 ± 237.48 | 1126.81 ± 182.39 | 0.777┼ |
| 34 (4%) | 12 (3.1%) | 1§ | 5 (2.6%) | 7 (3.6%) | 0.558* | |
| Mean epg ± SE | 5.16 ± 3.07 | 1.70 ± 1.05 | 0.81 ± 0.47 | 2.6 ± 2.06 | ||
| Hookworm | 38 (4.5%) | 15 (3.9%) | 0.598* | 5 (2.6%) | 10 (5.2%) | 0.188* |
| Mean epg ± SE | 4.86 ± 1.47 | 3.41 ± 1.75 | 3.56 ± 2.91 | 3.26 ± 1.97 | ||
| 7 (.8%) | 7 (1.8%) | 0.153§ | 3 (1.5%) | 4 (2.1%) | 1§ | |
| Mean epg ± SE | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.03 |
* χ2 test
┼ t-test
§ Fisher's exact test
Figure 2(A) Prevalence rates ± C.I. (. (B) Mean epg ± S.E. Treatment group N = 194, Placebo group N = 194.
Linear mixed effects model for the prevalence of A. lumbricoides in children aged 1–4 years, with parameter estimates (expressed as log-odds) and associated standard error of the estimate and p-values.
| Coefficient | Estimate | Std. Error | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | -0.02 | 0.16 | 0.89 |
| Group | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.274 |
| Age (years) | |||
| 1 | Reference | - | - |
| 2 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.40 |
| 3 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.59 |
| 4 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 0.82 |
| Time | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.59 |
| Group(treatment):Time | -0.14 | 0.02 | <0.001 |
Figure 3The odds of testing positive for . The placebo group is represented by the solid line while the treatment group is represented by the dotted line.
Figure 4(A) Prevalence rates ± C.I. (. (B) Mean epg ± S.E.
Figure 5Mean epg (± S.E.) (. Treatment group N = 91, Placebo group N = 104.
Figure 6Mean epg (± S.E.) (. Treatment group N = 103, Placebo group N = 90.