Literature DB >> 19226647

Understanding race and human variation: why forensic anthropologists are good at identifying race.

Stephen Ousley1, Richard Jantz, Donna Freid.   

Abstract

American forensicanthropologists uncritically accepted the biological race concept from classic physical anthropology and applied it to methods of human identification. Why and how the biological race concept might work in forensic anthropology was contemplated by Sauer (Soc Sci Med 34 1992 107-111), who hypothesized that American forensic anthropologists are good at what they do because of a concordance between social race and skeletal morphology in American whites and blacks. However, Sauer also stressed that this concordance did not validate the classic biological race concept of physical anthropology that there are a relatively small number of discrete types of human beings. Results from Howells (Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 67 1973 1-259; Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 79 1989 1-189; Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 82 1995 1-108) and others using craniometric and molecular data show strong geographic patterning of human variation despite overlap in their distributions. However, Williams et al. (Curr Anthropol 46 2005 340-346) concluded that skeletal morphology cannot be used to accurately classify individuals. Williams et al. cited additional support from Lewontin (Evol Biol 6 1972 381-398), who analyzed classic genetic markers. In this study, multivariate analyses of craniometric data support Sauer's hypothesis that there are morphological differences between American whites and blacks. We also confirm significant geographic patterning in human variation but also find differences among groups within continents. As a result, if biological races are defined by uniqueness, then there are a very large number of biological races that can be defined, contradicting the classic biological race concept of physical anthropology. Further, our results show that humans can be accurately classified into geographic origin using craniometrics even though there is overlap among groups. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19226647     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  9 in total

1.  FORDISC and the determination of ancestry from cranial measurements.

Authors:  Marina Elliott; Mark Collard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Using CRANID to test the population affinity of known crania.

Authors:  Lauren Kallenberger; Varsha Pilbrow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  AncesTrees: ancestry estimation with randomized decision trees.

Authors:  David Navega; Catarina Coelho; Ricardo Vicente; Maria Teresa Ferreira; Sofia Wasterlain; Eugénia Cunha
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Cranial secular change from the nineteenth to the twentieth century in modern German individuals compared to modern Euro-American individuals.

Authors:  Katharina Jellinghaus; Katharina Hoeland; Carolin Hachmann; Andreas Prescher; Michael Bohnert; Richard Jantz
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Anatomic Study of the Medial Collateral Ligament in Thai Population: A Cadaveric Study of 56 Elbows.

Authors:  Pamok Saengsirinavin; Rosarin Ratanalekha; Jaruwat Wechasil; Thanawan Jongthanakamol; Chaivat Sriratanavudhi; Woraphon Jaroenporn
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  A Qualitative Analysis of How Anthropologists Interpret the Race Construct.

Authors:  Jayne O Ifekwunigwe; Jennifer K Wagner; Joon-Ho Yu; Tanya M Harrell; Michael J Bamshad; Charmaine D Royal
Journal:  Am Anthropol       Date:  2017-08-14

7.  Diversity aboard a Tudor warship: investigating the origins of the Mary Rose crew using multi-isotope analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Scorrer; Katie E Faillace; Alexzandra Hildred; Alexandra J Nederbragt; Morten B Andersen; Marc-Alban Millet; Angela L Lamb; Richard Madgwick
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Sexual Dimorphism of Cranial Morphological Traits in an Italian Sample: A Population-Specific Logistic Regression Model for Predicting Sex.

Authors:  Annalisa Cappella; Barbara Bertoglio; Matteo Di Maso; Debora Mazzarelli; Luciana Affatato; Alessandra Stacchiotti; Chiarella Sforza; Cristina Cattaneo
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-10

9.  Ancestry Studies in Forensic Anthropology: Back on the Frontier of Racism.

Authors:  Ann H Ross; Shanna E Williams
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.