V G Kastbjerg1, L Gram. 1. National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. vgk@aqua.dtu.dk
Abstract
AIMS: To determine if Listeria monocytogenes persistent strains differ from presumed nonpersistent strains in disinfection susceptibility and to examine the influence of attachment and NaCl on susceptibility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two model-systems that allowed quantitative inter-strain comparison of disinfectant sensitivity were developed. Persistent L. monocytogenes were not more tolerant to the disinfectants Incimaxx DES and Triquart SUPER than presumed nonpersistent isolates. When calibrating the systems with respect to presence of biological material and cell density, attached bacteria were as sensitive to disinfectants as were planktonic bacteria. Growth with 5% NaCl increased the tolerance of planktonic cells to Incimaxx DES. All strains of spot inoculated L. monocytogenes survived well 20 h of drying when protected by growth media and 5% NaCl, but were not protected by NaCl against disinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent strains of L. monocytogenes are as susceptible to disinfectants as are presumed nonpersistent strains and attachment does not render the strains more tolerant to disinfectants. Growth with NaCl affected the susceptibility of the planktonic L. monocytogenes to Incimaxx DES and protected spot inoculated cells during drying. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Attachment to surfaces does not per se offer protection to L. monocytogenes against disinfectants and disinfection tolerances do not appear to influence the ability of a strain to persist.
AIMS: To determine if Listeria monocytogenes persistent strains differ from presumed nonpersistent strains in disinfection susceptibility and to examine the influence of attachment and NaCl on susceptibility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two model-systems that allowed quantitative inter-strain comparison of disinfectant sensitivity were developed. Persistent L. monocytogenes were not more tolerant to the disinfectants Incimaxx DES and Triquart SUPER than presumed nonpersistent isolates. When calibrating the systems with respect to presence of biological material and cell density, attached bacteria were as sensitive to disinfectants as were planktonic bacteria. Growth with 5% NaCl increased the tolerance of planktonic cells to Incimaxx DES. All strains of spot inoculated L. monocytogenes survived well 20 h of drying when protected by growth media and 5% NaCl, but were not protected by NaCl against disinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent strains of L. monocytogenes are as susceptible to disinfectants as are presumed nonpersistent strains and attachment does not render the strains more tolerant to disinfectants. Growth with NaCl affected the susceptibility of the planktonic L. monocytogenes to Incimaxx DES and protected spot inoculated cells during drying. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Attachment to surfaces does not per se offer protection to L. monocytogenes against disinfectants and disinfection tolerances do not appear to influence the ability of a strain to persist.
Authors: Anne Holch; Kristen Webb; Oksana Lukjancenko; David Ussery; Benjamin M Rosenthal; Lone Gram Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: V Ferreira; J Barbosa; M Stasiewicz; K Vongkamjan; A Moreno Switt; T Hogg; P Gibbs; P Teixeira; M Wiedmann Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Virginie Oxaran; Karen Kiesbye Dittmann; Sarah H I Lee; Luíza Toubas Chaul; Carlos Augusto Fernandes de Oliveira; Carlos Humberto Corassin; Virgínia Farias Alves; Elaine Cristina Pereira De Martinis; Lone Gram Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Aidan Casey; Edward M Fox; Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Aidan Coffey; Olivia McAuliffe; Kieran Jordan Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Cezar A Beltrame; Gabriela B Kubiak; Ieda Rottava; Geciane Toniazzo; Rogério L Cansian; Lindomar A Lerin; Débora de Oliveira; Helen Treichel Journal: Food Sci Nutr Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 2.863