Literature DB >> 19225858

A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

E Prieto-Díaz-Chávez1, J L Medina-Chávez, R Anaya-Prado.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of open tension-free techniques in hernia surgery seems to be superior to those techniques that apply tension to the suture line. However, the cost-effectiveness of tension vs. tension-free repairs has not been investigated before.
METHODS: This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis within a randomized controlled clinical trial that compared open-tension (OT) versus mesh-plug tension-free (MPTF) hernia repair, with a 2-year follow-up for each patient. Between July 2002 and June 2003, 106 patients with inguinal hernia were randomized to either procedure. Main outcome measures included average surgical time, time to full recovery, pain visual analog scale, amount of analgesics required, off-work time, hospital stay, and heath-care costs.
RESULTS: The average cost was $885.15 (95% CI $843.56-$926.74) and $837.66 (95% CI $796.42-878.89) USD for the OT and the MPTF herniorrhaphy, respectively (P < 0.05). Average yearly savings with the MPTF repair were calculated as $7,598.84 USD. Surgery time, time to full recovery, pain visual-analog scale, use of analgesics, off-work time, and hospital stay were significantly lower for the MPTF repair. Disability-adjusted life-years were reduced 56% with the MPTF repair, which represented a total savings of $12,656.60 USD with this procedure.
CONCLUSION: This controlled clinical trial demonstrates that the MPTF technique significantly decreases care costs in patients operated on for inguinal hernias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19225858     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0461-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  19 in total

1.  The recurrent groin hernia: therapeutic solutions.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Coala trial group.

Authors:  M S Liem; J A Halsema; Y van der Graaf; A J Schrijvers; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Short-term outcome after mesh or shouldice herniorrhaphy: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  R J Barth; K W Burchard; A Tosteson; J E Sutton; T A Colacchio; H F Henriques; R Howard; S Steadman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  An economic evaluation of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  K Lawrence; D McWhinnie; A Goodwin; A Gray; J Gordon; J Storie; J Britton; J Collin
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1996-03

5.  Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient.

Authors:  J Cunningham; W J Temple; P Mitchell; J A Nixon; R M Preshaw; N A Hagen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1994-04

8.  Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males.

Authors:  M Bay-Nielsen; E Nilsson; P Nordin; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost.

Authors:  J Wellwood; M J Sculpher; D Stoker; G J Nicholls; C Geddes; A Whitehead; R Singh; D Spiegelhalter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-11

10.  A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  T J Heikkinen; K Haukipuro; A Hulkko
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based assessment of the period of physical inactivity required after inguinal herniotomy.

Authors:  Hartmut Buhck; Mireille Untied; Wolf O Bechstein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Low-cost mesh for inguinal hernia repair in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  J Yang; D Papandria; D Rhee; H Perry; F Abdullah
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Bruno Amato; Lorenzo Moja; Salvatore Panico; Giovanni Persico; Corrado Rispoli; Nicola Rocco; Ivan Moschetti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

Review 4.  A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Bhangu; P Singh; T Pinkney; J M Blazeby
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kathleen Lockhart; Douglas Dunn; Shawn Teo; Jessica Y Ng; Manvinder Dhillon; Edward Teo; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.