Literature DB >> 19225174

The synergistic organization of muscle recruitment constrains visuomotor adaptation.

Aymar de Rugy1, Mark R Hinder, Daniel G Woolley, Richard G Carson.   

Abstract

Reaching to visual targets engages the nervous system in a series of transformations between sensory information and motor commands. That which remains to be determined is the extent to which the processes that mediate sensorimotor adaptation to novel environments engage neural circuits that represent the required movement in joint-based or muscle-based coordinate systems. We sought to establish the contribution of these alternative representations to the process of visuomotor adaptation. To do so we applied a visuomotor rotation during a center-out isometric torque production task that involved flexion/extension and supination/pronation at the elbow-joint complex. In separate sessions, distinct half-quadrant rotations (i.e., 45 degrees ) were applied such that adaptation could be achieved either by only rescaling the individual joint torques (i.e., the visual target and torque target remained in the same quadrant) or by additionally requiring torque reversal at a contributing joint (i.e., the visual target and torque target were in different quadrants). Analysis of the time course of directional errors revealed that the degree of adaptation was lower (by approximately 20%) when reversals in the direction of joint torques were required. It has been established previously that in this task space, a transition between supination and pronation requires the engagement of a different set of muscle synergists, whereas in a transition between flexion and extension no such change is required. The additional observation that the initial level of adaptation was lower and the subsequent aftereffects were smaller, for trials that involved a pronation-supination transition than for those that involved a flexion-extension transition, supports the conclusion that the process of adaptation engaged, at least in part, neural circuits that represent the required motor output in a muscle-based coordinate system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19225174     DOI: 10.1152/jn.90898.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Changes in muscle directional tuning parallel feedforward adaptation to a visuomotor rotation.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Enhancing the weight training experience: a comparison of limb kinematics and EMG activity on three machines.

Authors:  Yasushi Koyama; Hirofumi Kobayashi; Shuji Suzuki; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Visual target separation determines the extent of generalisation between opposing visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Daniel G Woolley; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson; Stephan Riek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Generalization via superposition: combined effects of mixed reference frame representations for explicit and implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Eugene Poh; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Distinct coordinate systems for adaptations of movement direction and extent.

Authors:  Eugene Poh; Timothy J Carroll; Aymar de Rugy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Robustness of muscle synergies during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Reinhard Gentner; Timothy Edmunds; Dinesh K Pai; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Are muscle synergies useful for neural control?

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Gerald E Loeb; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Consistent visuomotor adaptations and generalizations can be achieved through different rotations of robust motor modules.

Authors:  Cristiano De Marchis; Jacopo Di Somma; Magdalena Zych; Silvia Conforto; Giacomo Severini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods.

Authors:  Matthew Weightman; John-Stuart Brittain; R Chris Miall; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.