Literature DB >> 19224856

Gene expression profiles differentiating between breast cancers clinically responsive or resistant to letrozole.

William R Miller1, Alexey Larionov, Lorna Renshaw, Thomas J Anderson, John R Walker, Andreas Krause, Tobias Sing, Dean B Evans, J Michael Dixon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endocrine agents, such as letrozole, are established in the treatment of hormone-dependent breast cancer. However, response rates are only 50% to 70% in the neoadjuvant setting and lower in advanced disease. Thus there is a need to identify novel markers predicting for response and to understand molecular mechanisms of resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sequential tumor biopsies were taken before and after 10 to 14 days of neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole in patients with estrogen receptor-rich breast cancer. Expression profiles on high-density microarray chips were then related to clinical responses as assessed from tumor volume measurements after 3 months of treatment.
RESULTS: Of 52 patients, 37 (71%) were classified as having a clinical response to letrozole and 15 being clinically resistant. Bioinformatic analysis identified 205 covariables (69 baseline expression, 45 day 14 expression, and 91 change in expression with treatment) which differentiated between clinical responders and nonresponders. Hierarchical clustering using the variables separated responders and nonresponders into two distinct groups. Ontological assessment indicated that discriminating genes were enriched toward cellular biosynthetic processes. In particular, functional gene assessment showed ribosomal protein probes to have higher baseline expression in tumors responsive to letrozole and increased expression with treatment in nonresponding cases.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe genetic covariables and molecular processes discriminating between tumors clinically responsive and resistant to an aromatase inhibitor. The understanding of such molecular phenotypes will be important in optimizing the clinical use of aromatase inhibitors, both in terms of identifying responsive breast cancers and developing new agents to target resistance pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224856     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.8849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

1.  Opposing effects of Runx2 and estradiol on breast cancer cell proliferation: in vitro identification of reciprocally regulated gene signature related to clinical letrozole responsiveness.

Authors:  Nyam-Osor Chimge; Sanjeev K Baniwal; Jingqin Luo; Simon Coetzee; Omar Khalid; Benjamin P Berman; Debu Tripathy; Matthew J Ellis; Baruch Frenkel
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Effects of human mesenchymal stem cells on ER-positive human breast carcinoma cells mediated through ER-SDF-1/CXCR4 crosstalk.

Authors:  Lyndsay V Rhodes; James W Antoon; Shannon E Muir; Steven Elliott; Barbara S Beckman; Matthew E Burow
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 27.401

3.  Changes in expression of oestrogen regulated and proliferation genes with neoadjuvant treatment highlight heterogeneity of clinical resistance to the aromatase inhibitor, letrozole.

Authors:  William R Miller; Alexey Larionov
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool.

Authors:  Y H Chia; M J Ellis; C X Ma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Letrozole: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  GREB1 regulates PI3K/Akt signaling to control hormone-sensitive breast cancer proliferation.

Authors:  Corinne N Haines; Hope D Klingensmith; Makanko Komara; Craig J Burd
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Profiling of residual breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identifies DUSP4 deficiency as a mechanism of drug resistance.

Authors:  Justin M Balko; Rebecca S Cook; David B Vaught; María G Kuba; Todd W Miller; Neil E Bhola; Melinda E Sanders; Nara M Granja-Ingram; J Joshua Smith; Ingrid M Meszoely; Janine Salter; Mitch Dowsett; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Ana M González-Angulo; Gordon B Mills; Joseph A Pinto; Henry L Gómez; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  A gene expression signature from human breast cancer cells with acquired hormone independence identifies MYC as a mediator of antiestrogen resistance.

Authors:  Todd W Miller; Justin M Balko; Zara Ghazoui; Anita Dunbier; Helen Anderson; Mitch Dowsett; Ana M González-Angulo; Gordon B Mills; William R Miller; Huiyun Wu; Yu Shyr; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Nuclear receptor co-activators and HER-2/neu are upregulated in breast cancer patients during neo-adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  M Hauglid Flågeng; L L Haugan Moi; J M Dixon; J Geisler; E A Lien; W R Miller; P E Lønning; G Mellgren
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Tailored targeted therapy for all: a realistic and worthwhile objective?

Authors:  Per Eystein Lønning
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.