PURPOSE: Although most patients with estrogen receptor α (ER)-positive breast cancer initially respond to endocrine therapy, many ultimately develop resistance to antiestrogens. However, mechanisms of antiestrogen resistance and biomarkers predictive of such resistance are underdeveloped. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We adapted four ER(+) human breast cancer cell lines to grow in an estrogen-depleted medium. A gene signature of estrogen independence was developed by comparing expression profiles of long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) cells to their parental counterparts. We evaluated the ability of the LTED signature to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor and disease outcome following adjuvant tamoxifen. We utilized Gene Set Analysis (GSA) of LTED cell gene expression profiles and a loss-of-function approach to identify pathways causally associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. RESULTS: The LTED gene expression signature was predictive of high tumor cell proliferation following neoadjuvant therapy with anastrozole and letrozole, each in different patient cohorts. This signature was also predictive of poor recurrence-free survival in two studies of patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Bioinformatic interrogation of expression profiles in LTED cells revealed a signature of MYC activation. The MYC activation signature and high MYC protein levels were both predictive of poor outcome following tamoxifen therapy. Finally, knockdown of MYC inhibited LTED cell growth. CONCLUSIONS: A gene expression signature derived from ER(+) breast cancer cells with acquired hormone independence predicted tumor response to aromatase inhibitors and associated with clinical markers of resistance to tamoxifen. Activation of the MYC pathway was associated with this resistance.
PURPOSE: Although most patients with estrogen receptor α (ER)-positive breast cancer initially respond to endocrine therapy, many ultimately develop resistance to antiestrogens. However, mechanisms of antiestrogen resistance and biomarkers predictive of such resistance are underdeveloped. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We adapted four ER(+) human breast cancer cell lines to grow in an estrogen-depleted medium. A gene signature of estrogen independence was developed by comparing expression profiles of long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) cells to their parental counterparts. We evaluated the ability of the LTED signature to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor and disease outcome following adjuvant tamoxifen. We utilized Gene Set Analysis (GSA) of LTED cell gene expression profiles and a loss-of-function approach to identify pathways causally associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. RESULTS: The LTED gene expression signature was predictive of high tumor cell proliferation following neoadjuvant therapy with anastrozole and letrozole, each in different patient cohorts. This signature was also predictive of poor recurrence-free survival in two studies of patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Bioinformatic interrogation of expression profiles in LTED cells revealed a signature of MYC activation. The MYC activation signature and high MYC protein levels were both predictive of poor outcome following tamoxifen therapy. Finally, knockdown of MYC inhibited LTED cell growth. CONCLUSIONS: A gene expression signature derived from ER(+) breast cancer cells with acquired hormone independence predicted tumor response to aromatase inhibitors and associated with clinical markers of resistance to tamoxifen. Activation of the MYC pathway was associated with this resistance.
Authors: M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Raoul Tibes; Yihua Qiu; Yiling Lu; Bryan Hennessy; Michael Andreeff; Gordon B Mills; Steven M Kornblau Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: H A Coller; C Grandori; P Tamayo; T Colbert; E S Lander; R N Eisenman; T R Golub Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-03-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrea H Bild; Guang Yao; Jeffrey T Chang; Quanli Wang; Anil Potti; Dawn Chasse; Mary-Beth Joshi; David Harpole; Johnathan M Lancaster; Andrew Berchuck; John A Olson; Jeffrey R Marks; Holly K Dressman; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins Journal: Nature Date: 2005-11-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Bryan T Hennessy; Yiling Lu; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Mark S Carey; Simen Myhre; Zhenlin Ju; Michael A Davies; Wenbin Liu; Kevin Coombes; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Isabelle Bedrosian; Mollianne McGahren; Roshan Agarwal; Fan Zhang; Jens Overgaard; Jan Alsner; Richard M Neve; Wen-Lin Kuo; Joe W Gray; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Gordon B Mills Journal: Clin Proteomics Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.988
Authors: Vlad Popovici; Weijie Chen; Brandon G Gallas; Christos Hatzis; Weiwei Shi; Frank W Samuelson; Yuri Nikolsky; Marina Tsyganova; Alex Ishkin; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Kenneth R Hess; Vicente Valero; Daniel Booser; Mauro Delorenzi; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Leming Shi; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: John F Forbes; Jack Cuzick; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Jeffrey S Tobias; Michael Baum Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Syreeta L Tilghman; Ian Townley; Qiu Zhong; Patrick P Carriere; Jin Zou; Shawn D Llopis; Lynez C Preyan; Christopher C Williams; Elena Skripnikova; Melyssa R Bratton; Qiang Zhang; Guangdi Wang Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Christina Y Yim; Emmanuel Bikorimana; Ema Khan; Joshua M Warzecha; Leah Shin; Jennifer Rodriguez; Ethan Dmitrovsky; Sarah J Freemantle; Michael J Spinella Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Leena Hilakivi-Clarke; Anni Wärri; Kerrie B Bouker; Xiyuan Zhang; Katherine L Cook; Lu Jin; Alan Zwart; Nguyen Nguyen; Rong Hu; M Idalia Cruz; Sonia de Assis; Xiao Wang; Jason Xuan; Yue Wang; Bryan Wehrenberg; Robert Clarke Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Liqun Yu; Lawrence Wang; Chengjian Mao; Darjan Duraki; Ji Eun Kim; Rui Huang; William G Helferich; Erik R Nelson; Ben Ho Park; David J Shapiro Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: June X Zou; Zhijian Duan; Junjian Wang; Alex Sokolov; Jianzhen Xu; Christopher Z Chen; Jian Jian Li; Hong-Wu Chen Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Allison Goldberg; Zhao Lin; Ying-Hui Ko; Neal Flomenberg; Chenguang Wang; Stephanos Pavlides; Richard G Pestell; Anthony Howell; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 4.742