Literature DB >> 19224843

Developing an in-training examination for fellows: the experience of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Frances A Collichio1, Karen M Kayoumi, Kenneth R Hande, Richard E Hawkins, Janine L Hawley, David J Adelstein, Jean M D'Angelo, James A Stewart.   

Abstract

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) developed its own test -- the Medical Oncology In-Training Examination (MedOnc ITE) -- as a tool to assess trainees' knowledge of the clinical oncology subspecialty, establish consistency in educational standards across training programs, identify areas of strength and weakness in individual programs, and stimulate intraprogrammatic reading and discussion. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project provided additional incentive for ASCO to develop an ITE. The examination was developed in 4 years. The concept of the examination and the budget were approved by the ASCO governing board. The National Board of Medical Examiners was selected to work with ASCO. Fellowship programs were contacted to determine if they had the information technology support to hold the examination. A blueprint for the examination was developed. The test format, including the number of questions and the selection of case-based single best answers, was determined. Physician volunteers to write the questions were solicited from among program directors, various ASCO committees, and disease experts. A workshop was held to teach volunteers how to write proper case-based questions. From this pool, a smaller group of physicians was selected to develop the test and review all test questions. The final examination was developed and administered in February 2008, with scores provided to fellows and program directors in April 2008. Feedback received after the examination will be helpful for developing future MedOnc ITEs. The process ASCO went through to develop the MedOnc ITE serves as a model for other subspecialties interested in developing their own ITEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224843     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  3 in total

1.  Oncology fellows’ career plans, expectations, and well-being: do fellows know what they are getting into?

Authors:  Tait D Shanafelt; Marilyn Raymond; Leora Horn; Tim Moynihan; Frances Collichio; Helen Chew; Michael P Kosty; Daniel Satele; Jeff Sloan; William J Gradishar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Medical Knowledge Assessment by Hematology and Medical Oncology In-Training Examinations Are Better Than Program Director Assessments at Predicting Subspecialty Certification Examination Performance.

Authors:  Frances A Collichio; Brian J Hess; Elaine A Muchmore; Lauren Duhigg; Rebecca S Lipner; Steven Haist; Janine L Hawley; Carol A Morrison; Charles P Clayton; Marilyn J Raymond; Karen M Kayoumi; Scott D Gitlin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Improving formative assessments in Canadian medical oncology residency training.

Authors:  R Arora; S D Mukherjee
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.