Literature DB >> 19224798

Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting.

Duane J Funk1, Eugene W Moretti, Tong J Gan.   

Abstract

With advancing age and increased co-morbidities in patients, the need for monitoring devices during the perioperative period that allow clinicians to track physiologic variables, such as cardiac output (CO), fluid responsiveness and tissue perfusion, is increasing. Until recently, the only tool available to anesthesiologists to monitor CO was either a pulmonary artery catheter or transesophageal echocardiograph. These devices have their limitations and potential for morbidity. Several new devices (including esophageal Doppler monitors, pulse contour analysis, indicator dilution, thoracic bioimpedance and partial non-rebreathing systems) have recently been marketed which have the ability to monitor CO noninvasively and, in some cases, assess the patient's ability to respond to fluid challenges. In this review, we will describe these new devices including the technology, studies on their efficacy and the limitations of their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224798     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818ffd99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  41 in total

1.  Continuous minimally invasive peri-operative monitoring of cardiac output by pulmonary capnotracking: comparison with thermodilution and transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Philip J Peyton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Perioperative fluid and electrolyte management in cardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  Robert Young
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.

Authors:  Takashi Terada; Ayano Oiwa; Yumi Maemura; Samuna Robert; Sayaka Kessoku; Ryoichi Ochiai
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Impact of early haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in patients undergoing emergency surgery: an open prospective, randomised trial.

Authors:  Gordana Pavlovic; John Diaper; Christoph Ellenberger; Angela Frei; Karim Bendjelid; Fanny Bonhomme; Marc Licker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Hemodynamic monitoring during liver transplantation: A state of the art review.

Authors:  Mona Rezai Rudnick; Lorenzo De Marchi; Jeffrey S Plotkin
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-08

7.  New analyses of standard physiological signals: the old pipes give the sweetest smoke.

Authors:  Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Yatin Mehta; Dheeraj Arora
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-26

Review 9.  Choosing patient-tailored hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Cornelis Slagt; Rose-Marieke B G E Breukers; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Andrew R Butler; Andrew Brammar; Amanda Nicholson; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.