Literature DB >> 19224362

Novel tumor sampling strategies to enable microarray gene expression signatures in breast cancer: a study to determine feasibility and reproducibility in the context of clinical care.

Christopher L Tebbit1, Jun Zhai, Brian R Untch, Matthew J Ellis, Holly K Dressman, Rex C Bentley, Jay A Baker, Paul K Marcom, Joseph R Nevins, Jeffrey R Marks, John A Olson.   

Abstract

Feasibility and reproducibility of microarray biomarkers in clinical settings are doubted because of reliance on fresh frozen tissue. We sought to develop and validate a paradigm of frozen tissue collection from early breast tumors to enable use of microarray in oncology practice. Frozen core needle biopsies (CNBx) were collected from 150 clinical stage I patients during image-guided diagnostic biopsy and/or surgery. Histology and tumor content from frozen cores were compared to diagnostic specimens. Twenty-eight patients had microarray analysis to examine accuracy and reproducibility of predictive gene signatures developed for estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2. One hundred twenty-seven (85%) of 150 patients had at least one frozen core containing cancer suitable for microarray analysis. Larger tumor size, ex vivo biopsy, and use of a new specimen device increased the likelihood of obtaining adequate specimens. Sufficient quality RNA was obtained from 90% of tumor cores. Microarray signatures predicting ER and HER2 expression were developed in training sets of up to 363 surgical samples and were applied to microarray data obtained from core samples collected in clinical settings. In these samples, prediction of ER and HER2 expression achieved a sensitivity/specificity of 94%/100%, and 82%/72%, respectively. Predictions were reproducible in 83-100% of paired samples. Frozen CNBx can be readily obtained from most breast cancers without interfering with pathologic evaluation in routine clinical settings. Collection of tumor tissue at diagnostic biopsy and/or at surgery from lumpectomy specimens using image guidance resulted in sufficient samples for array analysis from over 90% of patients. Sampling of breast cancer for microarray data is reproducible and feasible in clinical practice and can yield signatures predictive of multiple breast cancer phenotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224362      PMCID: PMC3786337          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0301-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  26 in total

1.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles.

Authors:  M West; C Blanchette; H Dressman; E Huang; S Ishida; R Spang; H Zuzan; J A Olson; J R Marks; J R Nevins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  RGS16 function is regulated by epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation.

Authors:  A Derrien; K M Druey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Gene expression profiles obtained from fine-needle aspirations of breast cancer reliably identify routine prognostic markers and reveal large-scale molecular differences between estrogen-negative and estrogen-positive tumors.

Authors:  Lajos Pusztai; Mark Ayers; James Stec; Edward Clark; Kenneth Hess; David Stivers; Andrew Damokosh; Nour Sneige; Thomas A Buchholz; Francisco J Esteva; Banu Arun; Massimo Cristofanilli; Daniel Booser; Marguerite Rosales; Vicente Valero; Constantine Adams; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Gene expression predictors of breast cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Erich Huang; Skye H Cheng; Holly Dressman; Jennifer Pittman; Mei Hua Tsou; Cheng Fang Horng; Andrea Bild; Edwin S Iversen; Ming Liao; Chii Ming Chen; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins; Andrew T Huang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Augustinus A M Hart; Dorien W Voskuil; George J Schreiber; Johannes L Peterse; Chris Roberts; Matthew J Marton; Mark Parrish; Douwe Atsma; Anke Witteveen; Annuska Glas; Leonie Delahaye; Tony van der Velde; Harry Bartelink; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Emiel T Rutgers; Stephen H Friend; René Bernards
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Gene expression phenotypic models that predict the activity of oncogenic pathways.

Authors:  Erich Huang; Seiichi Ishida; Jennifer Pittman; Holly Dressman; Andrea Bild; Mark Kloos; Mark D'Amico; Richard G Pestell; Mike West; Joseph R Nevins
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Global gene expression changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human breast cancer.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; David N Stivers; James Stec; Mark Ayers; Edward Clark; Andrew Bolt; Aysegul A Sahin; W Fraser Symmans; Kenneth R Hess; Henry M Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

View more
  3 in total

1.  The biology underlying molecular imaging in oncology: from genome to anatome and back again.

Authors:  R J Gillies; A R Anderson; R A Gatenby; D L Morse
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Tumor acquisition for biomarker research in lung cancer.

Authors:  Marvaretta Stevenson; Jared Christensen; Debra Shoemaker; Traci Foster; William T Barry; Betty C Tong; Momen Wahidi; Scott Shofer; Michael Datto; Geoffrey Ginsburg; Jeffrey Crawford; Thomas D'Amico; Neal Ready
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Detection of treatment-induced changes in signaling pathways in gastrointestinal stromal tumors using transcriptomic data.

Authors:  Michael F Ochs; Lori Rink; Chi Tarn; Sarah Mburu; Takahiro Taguchi; Burton Eisenberg; Andrew K Godwin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 12.701

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.